• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶舱中的控制权:机组人员与计算机

Control in the cockpit: crews vs. computers.

作者信息

Ropelewski R

出版信息

Aerosp Am. 1996 Aug;34(8):28-33.

PMID:11538995
Abstract

In the no-holds-barred competition between Boeing and Europe's Airbus Industrie for dominance in the world's commercial jet airliner markets, the question of who--or what--is in charge in the cockpit has been a significant selling point. Airbus, which pioneered highly automated flight controls with its A320 narrow-body transport in the late 1980s, likes to emphasize the "protection" features built into the aircraft through those automated systems. Boeing, which employs many of the same concepts in its new 777 twin-engine widebody transport, tends to put more emphasis on crew involvement in the operation of that aircraft. Is there a difference? In fact, the question has broader implications than those involving the marketing battle between Boeing and Airbus. Airlines, aircraft manufacturers, flight training specialists, human factors gurus, and aviation authorities in various countries are struggling with the isse as automation becomes more and more prevalent on passenger and cargo-carrying aircraft around the world.

摘要

在波音公司与欧洲空中客车工业公司为称霸全球商用喷气式客机市场而展开的激烈竞争中,驾驶舱由谁——或什么——掌控的问题一直是一个重要的卖点。空中客车公司在20世纪80年代末推出A320窄体运输机时率先采用了高度自动化的飞行控制系统,它喜欢强调通过这些自动化系统内置在飞机中的“保护”功能。波音公司在其新型777双引擎宽体运输机中采用了许多相同的概念,往往更强调机组人员对该飞机操作的参与。这有区别吗?事实上,这个问题的影响比涉及波音和空客之间营销战的影响更为广泛。随着自动化在全球客运和货运飞机上越来越普遍,航空公司、飞机制造商、飞行训练专家、人为因素专家以及各国的航空当局都在为这个问题而苦苦挣扎。

相似文献

1
Control in the cockpit: crews vs. computers.驾驶舱中的控制权:机组人员与计算机
Aerosp Am. 1996 Aug;34(8):28-33.
2
Modern cockpit complexity challenges pilot interfaces.现代驾驶舱的复杂性对飞行员界面构成了挑战。
Aviat Week Space Technol. 1995 Jan 30;142(4):60-3.
3
Automated cockpits special report, part 1.自动化驾驶舱特别报告,第1部分。
Aviat Week Space Technol. 1995 Jan 30;142(5):52-65.
4
Automated cockpits special report, part 2.自动化驾驶舱特别报告,第2部分。
Aviat Week Space Technol. 1995 Feb 6;142(6):48-57.
5
At the intersection of automation and culture.在自动化与文化的交叉点。
Earth Space Rev. 1995;4(1):11-3.
6
Team play with a powerful and independent agent: operational experiences and automation surprises on the Airbus A-320.与强大且独立的代理进行团队协作:空客A - 320上的运行经验与自动化惊喜
Hum Factors. 1997 Dec;39(4):553-69. doi: 10.1518/001872097778667997.
7
Effects of conflict alerting system reliability and task difficulty on pilots' conflict detection with cockpit display of traffic information.冲突警报系统可靠性和任务难度对飞行员通过驾驶舱交通信息显示器进行冲突检测的影响。
Ergonomics. 2007 Jan 15;50(1):112-30. doi: 10.1080/00140130601002658.
8
Teaming humans and automated systems in safely engineered environments.在安全设计的环境中将人类与自动化系统结合起来。
Life Support Biosph Sci. 1998;5(4):453-60.
9
Cockpit-cabin communication: II. Shall we tell the pilots?驾驶舱与客舱通信:II. 我们要告诉飞行员吗?
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1996;6(3):211-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0603_1.
10
Cultural factors influencing safety need to be addressed in design and operation of technology.在技术的设计和运行中,需要考虑影响安全性的文化因素。
ICAO J. 1996 Oct;51(8):17-18, 27-28.