Suppr超能文献

用于马铃薯生长的固体基质和液体培养程序。

Solid matrix and liquid culture procedures for growth of potatoes.

作者信息

Tibbitts T W, Cao W

机构信息

University of Wisconsin, Department of Horticulture, Madison 53706, USA.

出版信息

Adv Space Res. 1994 Nov;14(11):427-33. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(94)90332-8.

Abstract

This report discusses the advantages and limitations of several different procedures for growth of potatoes for CELSS. Solution culture, in which roots and stolons are submerged, and aeroponic culture were not found useful for potatoes because stolons did not produce tubers unless a severe stress was applied to the plants. In detailed comparison studies, three selected culture systems were compared, nutrient film technique (NFT), NFT with shallow media, and pot culture with deep media. For the NFT and NFT plus shallow media, plants were grown in 0.3 m2 trays and for the deep medium culture, in 20 liter pots. A 1 cm depth of arcillite, a baked montmorillonite clay, was used as shallow media (NFT-arc). Peat-vermiculite mixture was used to fill the pots for the deep media. Nutrient solution, modified half-strength Hoagland's, was recirculated among the tray culture plants with pH automatically controlled at 5.5, and conductivity maintained at approximately 1100 microS cm-1 by adding stock nutrients or renewing the solution. A separate nutrient solution was used to water the pot plants four times daily to excess and the excess was discarded. Plants of Norland cv. were utilized and transplanted from sterile-propagated stem cutting plantlets. The plants were grown for 66 days under 12 h photoperiod in a first study and grown for 54 days under 24 h photoperiod in a second study. Under both photoperiods, total plant growth was greater in NFT-arc than in either NFT or pot culture. Under 12 h photoperiod, tuber dry weight was 30% higher with NFT-arc, but 50% lower with NFT, than with pot culture. Under 24 h photoperiod, however, tuber dry weight in both NFT and NFT-arc was only 20% of that in pot culture. The NFT and NFT-arc produced a greater shoot growth and larger number of small tubers than pot culture, especially with 24 h photoperiod. It is concluded that there are serious limitations to the use of NFT alone for growth of potatoes in a CELSS system. These limitations can be minimized by using a modified NFT with a shallow layer of media, such as arcillite, yet additional work is needed to ensure high tuber production with this system under long photoperiods.

摘要

本报告讨论了几种不同的用于受控生态生命支持系统(CELSS)种植马铃薯的方法的优点和局限性。水培法(根和匍匐茎浸没其中)和气雾培法对马铃薯无用,因为除非对植株施加严重胁迫,匍匐茎不会产生块茎。在详细的比较研究中,对三种选定的栽培系统进行了比较,即营养液膜技术(NFT)、带浅层基质的NFT和带深层基质的盆栽法。对于NFT和带浅层基质的NFT,植株种植在0.3平方米的托盘里;对于深层基质栽培,植株种植在20升的花盆中。1厘米厚的陶粒(一种焙烧蒙脱石粘土)用作浅层基质(NFT-陶粒)。泥炭-蛭石混合物用于填充花盆作为深层基质。改良的半强度霍格兰营养液在托盘栽培的植株间循环,pH值自动控制在5.5,通过添加储备养分或更换溶液将电导率维持在约1100微西门子/厘米。用单独的营养液每天给盆栽植株浇四次水直至过量,过量的水被倒掉。使用诺兰品种的植株,从无菌繁殖的茎切段幼苗移栽而来。在第一项研究中,植株在12小时光照周期下生长66天;在第二项研究中,植株在24小时光照周期下生长54天。在两种光照周期下,但NFT-陶粒中的总植株生长量均高于NFT或盆栽法。在12小时光照周期下,NFT-陶粒的块茎干重比盆栽法高30%,但NFT的块茎干重比盆栽法低50%。然而,在24小时光照周期下,NFT和NFT-陶粒中的块茎干重仅为盆栽法的20%。与盆栽法相比,NFT和NFT-陶粒产生的地上部生长量更大,小块茎数量更多,尤其是在24小时光照周期下。得出的结论是,在CELSS系统中单独使用NFT种植马铃薯存在严重局限性。通过使用带浅层基质(如陶粒)的改良NFT可以将这些局限性降至最低,但仍需要进一步开展工作以确保该系统在长光照周期下能实现高产块茎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验