Massion J, Popov K, Fabre J C, Rage P, Gurfinkel V
UPR Neurobiologie et Mouvements et Service d'Analyse du Mouvement, CNRS, Marseille, France.
Acta Astronaut. 1995 Oct-Dec;36(8-12):763-9. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(95)00167-0.
The control of the body orientation and the center of mass position with respect to the feet was investigated under normo- and microgravity (space flight Altair), during erect posture and at the end of a forward or backward upper trunk movement. It was observed that during erect posture, the trunk orientation with respect to the vertical was inclined some 6 degrees forward in both subjects under microgravity, whereas it was vertical or slightly backward oriented under normogravity. Under microgravity, on the contrary, the initial position CM changed either backwards or forwards. This result suggests that the inclined trunk posture might be due to misevaluating the verticality under microgravity and that different control mechanisms are involved in orienting the trunk and placing the CM. It was also noted that the final position of the CM at the end of the movement did not differ markedly between microgravity and normogravity. This result suggests that the kinematic synergies which stabilize the CM during upper trunk movements may result from an automatic central control which is independent from the gravity constraints.
在正常重力和微重力(太空飞行“牛郎星”号)条件下,研究了直立姿势以及上躯干向前或向后运动结束时,身体方位和相对于双脚的质心位置的控制情况。观察到,在直立姿势期间,微重力环境下两名受试者的躯干相对于垂直方向均向前倾斜约6度,而在正常重力环境下躯干为垂直方向或略微向后倾斜。相反,在微重力环境下,质心的初始位置会向后或向前变化。这一结果表明,躯干倾斜姿势可能是由于在微重力环境下对垂直度的错误评估,并且在躯干定向和质心定位过程中涉及不同的控制机制。还注意到,运动结束时质心的最终位置在微重力和正常重力环境下并无明显差异。这一结果表明,在上躯干运动过程中稳定质心的运动协同作用可能源于独立于重力约束的自动中枢控制。