Morgenthaler G W, Fester D A, Cooley C G
Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Colorado at Boulder, 80309-0429, USA.
Acta Astronaut. 1994 Jan;32(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/0094-5765(94)90146-5.
At high cabin pressure [e.g. 1013 hPa (14.7 psi) 21% O2] there are serious issues relative to specification of suit pressure and the need for prebreathing. A high pressure suit will be costly but use of the existing, flexible suit requires up to 6 h of prebreathing. Or one could use a cabin pressure of 700 hPa (10.2 psi) prior to extravehicular activity (EVA) in order to use the existing suit with only 1 h of prebreathing. If these normal cabin pressures and O2 levels are utilized, existing physiological and medical databases apply, providing a known basis for evaluating effects of long duration space missions. If a 345 hPa (5 psi), 70-100% O2 atmosphere is adopted the existing suit can be used with no prebreathing required. However, there is no reference database on physiological effects under the conditions of lower pressure and higher O2 concentration. This paper considers the major issues involved in defining habitat pressure, O2 fraction, and EVA suit design for operations in space. A preliminary model for evaluating habitat/suit pressure and O2% strategies is presented.
在高座舱压力下[例如1013百帕(14.7磅力/平方英寸),21%氧气],关于航天服压力的设定以及预呼吸的需求存在严重问题。高压航天服成本高昂,但使用现有的柔性航天服需要长达6小时的预呼吸。或者,在舱外活动(EVA)之前,可以将座舱压力设定为700百帕(10.2磅力/平方英寸),以便使用现有的航天服,且只需1小时的预呼吸。如果采用这些正常的座舱压力和氧气水平,现有的生理和医学数据库即可适用,为评估长期太空任务的影响提供了已知依据。如果采用345百帕(5磅力/平方英寸)、70 - 100%氧气的大气环境,则无需预呼吸即可使用现有的航天服。然而,在较低压力和较高氧气浓度条件下的生理效应方面没有参考数据库。本文探讨了为太空作业定义栖息地压力、氧气含量以及舱外活动航天服设计所涉及的主要问题。提出了一个用于评估栖息地/航天服压力和氧气百分比策略的初步模型。