Suppr超能文献

[鼠螨科(蜱螨亚纲:前气门目)螨类与跳鼠(啮齿目:跳鼠总科)的平行演化]

[Parallel evolution of Myobiidae (Acari: Prostigmata) mites and jerboas (Rodentia: Dipodoidea)].

作者信息

Bochkov A V

出版信息

Parazitologiia. 2001 Jan-Feb;35(1):9-18.

Abstract

The phenomenon of the parallel evolution is considered with the example of the myobiid mites (Acari: Prostigmata: Myobiidae) and the jerboas (Rodentia: Dipodoidea). According to recent phylogenetic studies of the superfamily Dipodoidea it is separated into 4 family: Allactagidae, Dipodidae, Zapodidae and Sminthidae (Shenbrot e. a., 1995). The myobiid mites of the subenus Dipodomyobia (11 species) of the genus Cryptomyobia are known as specific parasites associated with jerboas of the families Dipodidae and Allactagidae. One more species (Radfordia ewingi) considered as incertae sedis species within the genus Radfordia is found on the jerboas of the family Zapodidae. The myobiid mites are apparently absent on the members of the family Sminthidae. The reconstruction of phylogeny of the myobiid subgenus Dipodomyobia was carried out by the cladistic method (software PAUP 3.0 s). The analysis was based on 13 morphological characters. At the first step of analysis 42 parsimonious trees have been obtained. The strict consensus tree displays one distinct cluster, which incorporates mites of the allactaga species of group restricted to the jerboa family Allactagidae, and several plesions, species of which are usually refferred to as dipi species group and associated with the family Dipodidae (fig. 1). At the second step of analysis, two characters, which appeared as homoplasies at the first step of analysis were excluded, and one new characters (structure of male genital shield) was additionally included. Single cladogram obtained displays two general clusters and one plesion. The first cluster comprises the allactaga species group (parasites of Allactagidae). The second cluster incorporates the dipi species group, the parasites of subfamilies Dipodinae and Paradipodinae of Dipodidae). The plesion is represented by one species Cryptomyobia baranovae being a specific parasite of Salpingotus crassicauda (Cardiocraninae, Dipodidae). There is the high level congruence between the pattern of myobiid cladogram and jerboas phylogeny proposed by Shenbrot (1992) (fig. 2). The position of one species C. paradipi (the parasite of Paradipus ctenodactylus, single representative of subfam. Paradipodinae) does not fit to this phylogenetic system of the jerboas. This mite species belongs to the claster dipi. All others myobiid species of this group are the parasites of the subfamily Dipodinae. In the cladogram of jerboas, the subfam. Paradipodinae is a sister group of Cardiocraninae, but not of Dipodinae, as it is suggested by the parasitological data. If sinapomorphies in the node Paradipodinae--Cardiocraninae are not correct (as Shenbrot admitted), there would be a complete congruence between the phylogenetic pattern of myobiid and of jerboas. The general phylogeny of Dipodoidea based on citogenetical data was proposed by Vorontsov e. a. (1971). 3 families only were recognized within Dipodoidea: Zapodidae, Sminthidae and Dipodidae. The latter family included 3 subfamilies: Dipodinae, Cardiocraninae and Allactaginae. The version of the jerboa phylogeny proposed in the present paper based on parasitological data corresponds in general lines to the hypotesis of Vorontsov e. a. (1971). The myobiid mites are absent on Sminthidae, they are represented by one species incertae sedis on Zapodidae, and by the subgenus Dipodomyobia on others jerboas (Dipodidae sensu Vorontsov e. a.). According to the parasitological data, the subfamilies Dipodinae and Allactaginae are the sister groups, because the myobiid mites of the subgenus Dipodomyobia parazitise on the jerboas of these taxa only. The subfamily Paradipodinae (sensu Shenbrot) is a sister group for Dipodinae, as far as species C. paradipi is the sister species to other members of the dipi group. The subfamily Cardiocraninae is a sister group for the node Dipodinae-Paradipodinae and also should be included to Dipodidae, because the aberrant species C. baranovae is obviously related to the dipi species group.

摘要

以肌螨科螨类(蜱螨亚纲:前气门目:肌螨科)和跳鼠(啮齿目:跳鼠总科)为例,探讨了平行进化现象。根据跳鼠总科最近的系统发育研究,它被分为4个科:五趾跳鼠科、跳鼠科、林跳鼠科和荒漠跳鼠科(申布罗特等人,1995年)。隐肌螨属双足跳鼠亚属的肌螨科螨类(11种)是与跳鼠科和五趾跳鼠科跳鼠相关的特异性寄生虫。在林跳鼠科的跳鼠身上发现了另一种被认为是拉氏螨属不确定地位物种的螨(尤氏拉氏螨)。荒漠跳鼠科的成员身上显然没有肌螨科螨类。通过分支系统学方法(软件PAUP 3.0 s)对肌螨科双足跳鼠亚属的系统发育进行了重建。分析基于13个形态学特征。在分析的第一步,得到了42棵简约树。严格合意树显示出一个明显的类群,其中包括局限于五趾跳鼠科的五趾跳鼠属物种的螨,以及几个近祖类型,其物种通常被称为双足跳鼠属物种群,并与跳鼠科相关(图1)。在分析的第二步,排除了在第一步分析中表现为同塑的两个特征,并额外纳入了一个新特征(雄性生殖盾的结构)。得到的单一分支图显示出两个总体类群和一个近祖类型。第一个类群包括五趾跳鼠属物种群(五趾跳鼠科的寄生虫)。第二个类群包括双足跳鼠属物种群,即跳鼠科双足跳鼠亚科和副跳鼠亚科的寄生虫。近祖类型由一种巴拉诺夫隐肌螨代表,它是粗尾心颅跳鼠(心颅跳鼠亚科,跳鼠科)的特异性寄生虫。肌螨科分支图的模式与申布罗特(1992年)提出的跳鼠系统发育之间存在高度一致性(图2)。一种副双足跳鼠隐肌螨(栉趾跳鼠的寄生虫,副跳鼠亚科的唯一代表)的位置不符合这种跳鼠的系统发育体系。这种螨类物种属于双足跳鼠属类群。该类群的所有其他肌螨科物种都是双足跳鼠亚科的寄生虫。在跳鼠的分支图中,副跳鼠亚科是心颅跳鼠亚科的姐妹群,而不是如寄生虫学数据所暗示的双足跳鼠亚科的姐妹群。如果副跳鼠亚科—心颅跳鼠亚科节点中的共衍征不正确(正如申布罗特所承认的那样),那么肌螨科和跳鼠的系统发育模式将完全一致。沃龙佐夫等人(1971年)基于细胞遗传学数据提出了跳鼠总科的总体系统发育。在跳鼠总科中只识别出3个科:林跳鼠科、荒漠跳鼠科和跳鼠科。后一个科包括3个亚科:双足跳鼠亚科、心颅跳鼠亚科和五趾跳鼠亚科。本文基于寄生虫学数据提出的跳鼠系统发育版本在总体上与沃龙佐夫等人(1971年)的假说一致。荒漠跳鼠科没有肌螨科螨类,林跳鼠科有一个不确定地位的物种,其他跳鼠(沃龙佐夫等人意义上的跳鼠科)有双足跳鼠亚属。根据寄生虫学数据,双足跳鼠亚科和五趾跳鼠亚科是姐妹群,因为双足跳鼠亚属的肌螨科螨类仅寄生于这些类群的跳鼠身上。副跳鼠亚科(申布罗特意义上的)是双足跳鼠亚科的姐妹群,因为副双足跳鼠隐肌螨是双足跳鼠属类群其他成员的姐妹物种。心颅跳鼠亚科是双足跳鼠亚科—副跳鼠亚科节点的姐妹群,也应归入跳鼠科,因为异常物种巴拉诺夫隐肌螨显然与双足跳鼠属物种群有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验