Myles T D, Galvez-Myles R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1400 Wallace Boulevard, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA.
J Reprod Med. 2001 Aug;46(8):729-34.
To determine if there were differences in a medical student's subjective grade and obstetric-gynecologic (OB/GYN) test scores based upon the student's site of rotation, hospital type or presence of OB/GYN residents.
We evaluated 521 students taking their third-year OB/GYN clerkship. The OB/GYN clerkship was eight weeks in length. The six sites (five community and one university) divided the OB/GYN rotations similarly. Five sites had OB/GYN residents; three had University of Illinois (UIC) residents. Comparisons were made between each student's subjective grade and OB/GYN final examination test score with respect to site, presence/absence of OB/GYN residents, community vs. university hospital and presence of UIC residents. Using the chi 2 test of association and regression models, we evaluated for relationships between the subjective grades, final examination scores and final grades. Significance was set at P < .05 for all evaluations.
Examination scores lowered final grades for 9.4% of students trained at the university hospital as opposed to 11.5% of nonuniversity hospitals. Final examination scores were lower than subjective assessments more often than in the nonuniversity hospitals (27.6% vs. 16.2%, P < .001). Hospitals with OB/GYN residents had less of a reduction in grades than did those without residents (8.9% vs. 24.6%, P < .0001) as well as lower final examination scores (with respect to subjective grade) (21.5% vs. 40.3%, P < .0001). The presence of UIC residents further reduced the incidence of examination scores lower than subjective assessment (19.7% vs. 34.0%, P < .0001). A linear correlation was noted between subjective grade and final examination score (r = .243, P < .001); this was strongest at the university hospital.
Students trained at a university hospital were less likely to have test scores lower than their subjective grades. Subjective assessments made in the presence of OB/GYN residents reduced the likelihood of a final grade reduction.
根据医学生的轮转地点、医院类型或妇产科住院医师的存在情况,确定其主观成绩和妇产科(OB/GYN)考试成绩是否存在差异。
我们评估了521名参加三年级妇产科实习的学生。妇产科实习为期八周。六个地点(五个社区和一个大学)对妇产科轮转进行了类似划分。五个地点有妇产科住院医师;三个有伊利诺伊大学(UIC)的住院医师。就地点、妇产科住院医师的有无、社区医院与大学医院以及UIC住院医师的存在情况,对每个学生的主观成绩和妇产科期末考试成绩进行了比较。使用卡方关联检验和回归模型,我们评估了主观成绩、期末考试成绩和最终成绩之间的关系。所有评估的显著性设定为P < .05。
在大学医院接受培训的学生中,考试成绩使最终成绩降低的比例为9.4%,而非大学医院为11.5%。与非大学医院相比,期末考试成绩低于主观评估的情况更常见(27.6%对16..2%,P < .001)。有妇产科住院医师的医院成绩降低的幅度小于没有住院医师的医院(8.9%对24.6%,P < .0001),期末考试成绩(相对于主观成绩)也更低(21.5%对40.3%,P < .0001)。UIC住院医师的存在进一步降低了考试成绩低于主观评估的发生率(19.7%对34.0%,P < .0001)。主观成绩与期末考试成绩之间存在线性相关性(r = .243,P < .001);这在大学医院最为明显。
在大学医院接受培训的学生考试成绩低于其主观成绩的可能性较小。在有妇产科住院医师的情况下进行主观评估可降低最终成绩降低的可能性。