• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Stable ventricular tachycardia is not a benign rhythm: insights from the AVID registry. Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):377.

PMID:11547738
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Stable ventricular tachycardia is not a benign rhythm: insights from the AVID registry. Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators.稳定型室性心动过速并非良性节律：来自抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器（AVID）注册研究的见解
Indian Heart J. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):377.
2
[The benefits of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in comparisons with anti-arrhythmia agents in patients surviving malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a subanalysis of the AVID study by varying degrees of left ventricular dysfunction. Antiarrhythmic versus Implantable Defibrillators].
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000 Apr;1(4):577-8.
3
A comparison of the AVID and DAVID trials of implantable defibrillators.植入式除颤器的AVID试验与DAVID试验的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 15;95(12):1431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.008.
4
"Stable" ventricular tachycardia is not a benign rhythm : insights from the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) registry.“稳定型”室性心动过速并非良性节律：来自抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器（AVID）注册研究的见解
Circulation. 2001 Jan 16;103(2):244-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.2.244.
5
[Out-of- or in-hospital occurrences of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias: the prognostic significance in the population enrolled in the AVID study. Antiarrhythmic versus Implantable Defibrillators].[院外或院内发生的恶性室性快速心律失常：在参加AVID研究的人群中的预后意义。抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器对比研究]
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2000 Apr;1(4):579-80.
6
Beta-blocker use and survival in patients with ventricular fibrillation or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia: the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial.β受体阻滞剂在心室颤动或有症状室性心动过速患者中的应用与生存情况：抗心律失常药物与植入式除颤器（AVID）试验
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Aug;34(2):325-33. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00234-x.
7
Implantable defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia.患有室性心律失常高风险的冠心病患者的植入式除颤器
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 5;336(23):1676; author reply 1677. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706053362313.
8
Implantable defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia.患有冠心病且有室性心律失常高风险患者的植入式除颤器
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 5;336(23):1677.
9
In-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias predicts survival: results from the AVID Registry. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Oct;34(4):1111-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00305-8.
10
Determinants of outcome in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) study registry.持续性室性快速心律失常患者预后的决定因素：抗心律失常药物与植入式心脏除颤器（AVID）研究注册
Am Heart J. 2000 May;139(5):804-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(00)90011-5.