• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Paralysing agents may be given up to but not at or beyond the point of extubation.

作者信息

Inwald D, Vandyck W

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):389-90.

PMID:11548686
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Paralysing agents may be given up to but not at or beyond the point of extubation.伦理辩论：在麻痹剂作用下停止维持生命治疗与安乐死之间的区别。可以使用麻痹剂，但不能在拔管之时或之后使用。
BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):389-90.
2
Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. The doctrine of double effect is difficult but not impossible to apply.伦理辩论：在麻痹性药物影响下停止维持生命治疗与安乐死之间的区别。双重效应原则虽难以应用，但并非不可能。
BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):390-1.
3
Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Are we treading a fine line?伦理辩论：在麻痹药物影响下停止维持生命治疗与安乐死之间的区别。我们是否在走钢丝？
BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):388-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.388.
4
Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. The parents perspective on withdrawing treatment.
BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):390.
5
Defending the sanctity of life principle: a reply to John Keown.
J Law Med. 2011 Jun;18(4):820-34.
6
Withdrawing life sustaining treatment and euthanasia debate. Double effect is different from euthanasia.
BMJ. 2001 Nov 24;323(7323):1248-9.
7
Withdrawing life sustaining treatment and euthanasia debate. Euthanasia may be ethical, but it is not legal.撤除维持生命治疗与安乐死之争。安乐死或许合乎伦理，但并不合法。
BMJ. 2001 Nov 24;323(7323):1248.
8
Physician assisted suicide, euthanasia, and withdrawal of treatment. Full debate is needed in Britain..医生协助自杀、安乐死及停止治疗。英国需要进行充分辩论。
BMJ. 1998 Jan 3;316(7124):71.
9
Euthanasia. Figures for "slow euthanasia" should be included in data on physician assisted suicide.
BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):809.
10
Medical decisions at the end-of-life: lessons from America.
Hawaii Med J. 1995 Apr;54(4):514-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Police in an intensive care unit: what can happen?重症监护病房里的警察：会发生什么？
J Med Ethics. 2013 Dec;39(12):772-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100681. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
2
The legal framework for end of life care: a United Kingdom perspective.临终关怀的法律框架：英国视角
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jan;33(1):158-62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0426-9. Epub 2006 Nov 8.