Osma M M, Ortuño F, Lozano M L, Gomez-Espuch J, Ayala F, Sanchez-Serrano I, Perez-Ceballos E, Moraleda J M, Vicente V
Unit of Hematology and Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, Hospital General Universitario, Murcia, Spain.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001 Jun;27(12):1287-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703079.
Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) has been widely used after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (APBSCT) in an attempt to reduce the duration of neutropenia, but whether this treatment has any influence on long-term engraftment remains unknown. We have retrospectively analyzed data from breast cancer patients to compare post-APBSCT rhG-CSF administration in terms of the short-term benefit and myeloid marrow regeneration after 1 year. Group A included 10 patients not treated with post-APBSCT rhG-CSF, while groups B and C comprised 15 and 13 patients treated with this drug from days +1 and +6, respectively. No differences among the three groups were found in age, diagnosis, previous chemo-radiotherapy, CD34+/CD71- cell concentration in pre-transplant bone marrow (BM), mobilization schedule, CD34+ cell yield, conditioning regimen and post-transplant radiotherapy. Post-APBSCT rhG-CSF was shown to accelerate neutrophil recovery, but there were no significant differences in platelet recovery, transfusion requirements, days of fever, antibiotic administration or inhospital stay. With regard to BM hematopoietic precursors 1 year after APBSCT, significantly lower concentrations of total CD34+ cells, committed CD34+/CD33+ subsets, and more immature CD34+/CD71- cells were found in both groups B and C compared with patients not having received the cytokine (group A). Thus, post-APBSCT rhG-CSF administration does not appear to beneficially affect procedure outcome, and might even impair long-term marrow hematopoiesis.
重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)已广泛应用于自体外周血干细胞移植(APBSCT)后,试图缩短中性粒细胞减少的持续时间,但这种治疗对长期植入是否有任何影响仍不清楚。我们回顾性分析了乳腺癌患者的数据,以比较APBSCT后rhG-CSF给药在短期益处和1年后骨髓再生方面的情况。A组包括10例未接受APBSCT后rhG-CSF治疗的患者,而B组和C组分别包括15例和13例从第+1天和第+6天开始接受该药物治疗的患者。三组在年龄、诊断、既往放化疗、移植前骨髓(BM)中CD34+/CD71-细胞浓度、动员方案、CD34+细胞产量、预处理方案和移植后放疗方面均未发现差异。APBSCT后rhG-CSF被证明可加速中性粒细胞恢复,但在血小板恢复、输血需求、发热天数、抗生素使用或住院时间方面没有显著差异。关于APBSCT后1年的BM造血前体细胞,与未接受细胞因子治疗的患者(A组)相比,B组和C组的总CD34+细胞、定向CD34+/CD33+亚群以及更不成熟的CD34+/CD71-细胞浓度均显著降低。因此,APBSCT后给予rhG-CSF似乎对手术结果没有有益影响,甚至可能损害长期骨髓造血功能。