Perri M G, Nezu A M, McKelvey W F, Shermer R L, Renjilian D A, Viegener B J
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0165, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Aug;69(4):722-6.
This study compared 2 extended therapy programs for weight management with standard behavioral treatment (BT) without additional therapy contacts. Participants were 80 obese women who completed 20 weekly group sessions of BT and achieved a mean initial weight loss of 8.74 kg. Participants were randomly assigned to a no-further-contact condition (BT only) or to one of two extended interventions consisting of relapse prevention training (RPT) or problem-solving therapy (PST). No significant overall weight-change differences were observed between RPT and BT or between RPT and PST. However, participants who completed the PST intervention had significantly greater long-term weight reductions than BT participants, and a significantly larger percentage of PST participants achieved clinically significant losses of 10% or more in body weight than did BT participants (35% vs. 6%).
本研究将两种用于体重管理的强化治疗方案与无额外治疗接触的标准行为治疗(BT)进行了比较。参与者为80名肥胖女性,她们完成了20次每周一次的BT小组治疗课程,平均初始体重减轻了8.74千克。参与者被随机分配到无进一步接触组(仅BT)或两种强化干预措施之一,即预防复发训练(RPT)或解决问题疗法(PST)。在RPT与BT之间或RPT与PST之间未观察到显著的总体体重变化差异。然而,完成PST干预的参与者的长期体重减轻显著大于BT参与者,且PST参与者中体重临床显著减轻10%或更多的比例显著高于BT参与者(35%对6%)。