Redstone H A, Barrowman N, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten S J
Division of Gastroenterology, Dalhousie University, Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Sep;15(9):1291-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01044.x.
To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists in functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia.
A Medline search was used to identify placebo controlled randomized clinical trials, using the subject headings dyspepsia and H2-receptor antagonist.
Global assessment by the patient of dyspepsia symptoms, improvement of epigastric pain and complete relief of epigastric pain.
Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, 15 of which reported the active drug to be superior to placebo. Many studies suffered from suboptimal study design. The odds ratio in favour of active drug was 1.48 (95% confidence interval: 0.9-2.3) for global assessment of dyspepsia symptoms, 2.3 (95% CI: 1.6-3.3) for improvement of epigastric pain, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2-2.8) for complete relief of epigastric pain.
There is some evidence that H2-receptor antagonists are superior to placebo in functional dyspepsia, but larger studies evaluating higher doses of H2-receptor antagonists and of longer duration are necessary to determine the exact effect size.
进行一项荟萃分析,评估H2受体拮抗剂在功能性(非溃疡性)消化不良中的疗效。
使用医学主题词“消化不良”和“H2受体拮抗剂”,通过检索Medline来识别安慰剂对照的随机临床试验。
患者对消化不良症状的整体评估、上腹部疼痛的改善情况以及上腹部疼痛的完全缓解情况。
22项研究符合纳入标准,其中15项报告活性药物优于安慰剂。许多研究的设计不够理想。对于消化不良症状的整体评估,支持活性药物的优势比为1.48(95%置信区间:0.9 - 2.3);对于上腹部疼痛的改善,优势比为2.3(95%置信区间:1.6 - 3.3);对于上腹部疼痛的完全缓解,优势比为1.8(95%置信区间:1.2 - 2.8)。
有证据表明H2受体拮抗剂在功能性消化不良中优于安慰剂,但需要开展更大规模、评估更高剂量和更长疗程的H2受体拮抗剂的研究,以确定确切的效应大小。