• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia.西咪替丁、雷尼替丁、法莫替丁和奥美拉唑治疗儿童消化不良疗效的比较研究。
ISRN Pediatr. 2011;2011:219287. doi: 10.5402/2011/219287. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
2
Clinical evaluation of the effect of omeprazole, cimetidine, famotidine and ranitidine on histamine induced cutaneous wheal and flare response.奥美拉唑、西咪替丁、法莫替丁和雷尼替丁对组胺诱导的皮肤风团和潮红反应影响的临床评估
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1993 Jul;31(7):322-5.
3
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing lansoprazole with ranitidine or famotidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer.比较兰索拉唑与雷尼替丁或法莫替丁治疗急性十二指肠溃疡的随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Jul;7(7):661-5.
4
The management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice: a comparison of an omeprazole versus an antacid-alginate/ranitidine management strategy. Compete Research Group [corrected].全科医疗中酸相关性消化不良的管理:奥美拉唑与抗酸剂-藻酸盐/雷尼替丁管理策略的比较。竞争研究小组[已校正]
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Mar;12(3):263-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00282.x.
5
Comparative efficacy of cimetidine, famotidine, ranitidine, and mylanta in postoperative stress ulcers. Gastric pH control and ulcer prevention in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.西咪替丁、法莫替丁、雷尼替丁和氢氧化铝镁合剂预防术后应激性溃疡的疗效比较。冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的胃pH值控制及溃疡预防。
Gastroenterology. 1991 Jun;100(6):1515-20. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90647-4.
6
Erratum to "the comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia".《西咪替丁、雷尼替丁、法莫替丁和奥美拉唑治疗儿童消化不良疗效的比较研究》勘误
ISRN Pediatr. 2013 Mar 28;2013:206546. doi: 10.1155/2013/206546. Print 2013.
7
Molecular pharmacological approaches to effects of capsaicinoids and of classical antisecretory drugs on gastric basal acid secretion and on indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal damage in human healthy subjects (mini review).辣椒素类和经典抗分泌药物对人类健康受试者胃基础酸分泌和消炎痛诱导的胃黏膜损伤影响的分子药理学方法(综述)。
Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(1):84-9. doi: 10.2174/13816128130112.
8
Famotidine in the therapy of gastric hypersecretory states.法莫替丁治疗胃酸分泌过多状态
Am J Med. 1986 Oct 24;81(4B):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90600-5.
9
Double blind comparison of the effects of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and placebo on intragastric acidity in 30 normal volunteers.西咪替丁、雷尼替丁、法莫替丁及安慰剂对30名正常志愿者胃内酸度影响的双盲比较。
Gut. 1988 Jan;29(1):81-4. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.1.81.
10
Comparison of immunomodulative effects of the histamine-2 receptor antagonists cimetidine, ranitidine, and famotidine on peripheral blood mononuclear cells in gastric cancer patients.组胺-2受体拮抗剂西咪替丁、雷尼替丁和法莫替丁对胃癌患者外周血单个核细胞免疫调节作用的比较。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;30(3):265-71. doi: 10.3109/00365529509093275.

引用本文的文献

1
An Update on the Assessment and Management of Pediatric Abdominal Pain.小儿腹痛评估与管理的最新进展
Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2021 Aug 6;12:373-393. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S287719. eCollection 2021.
2
How does one choose the appropriate pharmacotherapy for pediatric patients with functional dyspepsia?如何为功能性消化不良的儿科患者选择合适的药物治疗方法?
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019 Nov;20(16):1921-1924. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1650021. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Pharmacological interventions for recurrent abdominal pain in childhood.儿童复发性腹痛的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 6;3(3):CD010973. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010973.pub2.
4
Visceral hypersensitivity and electromechanical dysfunction as therapeutic targets in pediatric functional dyspepsia.内脏高敏感性和机电功能障碍作为儿童功能性消化不良的治疗靶点。
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Aug 6;5(3):122-38. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i3.122.
5
Eosinophils and mast cells as therapeutic targets in pediatric functional dyspepsia.嗜酸性粒细胞和肥大细胞作为儿童功能性消化不良的治疗靶点
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov 6;4(4):86-96. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v4.i4.86.
6
Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: child/adolescent.儿童功能性胃肠病:儿童/青少年
Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1527-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.063.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacotherapy for functional gastrointestinal disorders in children.儿童功能性胃肠病的药物治疗
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 Apr;48 Suppl 2:S101-3. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181a15f49.
2
Proton pump inhibitors: effective first-line treatment for management of dyspepsia.质子泵抑制剂:消化不良管理的有效一线治疗方法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Apr;52(4):983-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9156-7. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
3
Functional dyspepsia--a multicausal disease and its therapy.功能性消化不良——一种多病因疾病及其治疗
Phytomedicine. 2006;13 Suppl 5:2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
4
Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: child/adolescent.儿童功能性胃肠病:儿童/青少年
Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1527-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.063.
5
Initial management strategies for dyspepsia.消化不良的初始管理策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD001961. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001961.pub2.
6
Treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders associated with abdominal pain.与腹痛相关的功能性胃肠疾病的治疗。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005 Sep;41 Suppl 1:S47-8. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000180303.71557.71.
7
Psychological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia.非溃疡性消化不良的心理干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD002301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002301.pub4.
8
Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study of four weeks of lansoprazole for the treatment of functional dyspepsia in Chinese patients.兰索拉唑治疗中国患者功能性消化不良四周的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Gut. 2002 Oct;51(4):502-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.51.4.502.
9
H2-receptor antagonists in the treatment of functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.H2受体拮抗剂治疗功能性(非溃疡性)消化不良:随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Sep;15(9):1291-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01044.x.
10
Treatment of non-ulcer dyspepsia: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled prospective studies.非溃疡性消化不良的治疗:安慰剂对照前瞻性研究的荟萃分析
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001 Sep;36(9):934-41. doi: 10.1080/003655201750305440.

西咪替丁、雷尼替丁、法莫替丁和奥美拉唑治疗儿童消化不良疗效的比较研究。

The comparative study of the effectiveness of cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, and omeprazole in treatment of children with dyspepsia.

作者信息

Dehghani Seyed Mohsen, Imanieh Mohammad Hadi, Oboodi Roya, Haghighat Mahmood

机构信息

Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Pediatric Gastroenterology Department, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz 71937-11351, Iran.

出版信息

ISRN Pediatr. 2011;2011:219287. doi: 10.5402/2011/219287. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

DOI:10.5402/2011/219287
PMID:22389770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3263570/
Abstract

Background. Functional dyspepsia is a common chronic disorder with non specific upper abdominal pain or discomfort. Different approaches with anti-secretory, spasmolytic, prokinetic and anti-inflammatory effects and most preferably reduction of visceral hypersensitivity seem logical. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of the four most drugs used for treatment of dyspepsia in children. Methods. 169 patients between 2 to 16 years old that 47.3% was male and 52.7% was female were enrolled in this clinical trial study by the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia. Then for each patient one of the drugs; Omeprazole, Famotidine, Ranitidine or Cimetidine was administered, for a period of 4 weeks. Patients were followed after 2 and 6 weeks from the beginning of the treatment. Results. The distribution of drugs between these patients were including; 21.9% with Cimetidine, 21.3% with Famotidine, 30.8% with Omeperazole and 26% with Ranitidine that the proportion of patients with all symptoms relief were: 21.6% for Cimetidine, 44.4% for Famotidine, 53.8% for Omeprazole and 43.2% for Cimetidine (P = .024). In followups within 2 and 6 weeks after beginning medical therapy, no side effects due to drugs were seen. Conclusion. If a cure is defined as all symptoms relief after a period of 4 weeks treatment, our findings showed that Omeperazole are superior to Ranitidine, Famotidine, and Cimetidine for management of functional dyspepsia.

摘要

背景。功能性消化不良是一种常见的慢性疾病,表现为非特异性上腹部疼痛或不适。采用具有抗分泌、解痉、促动力和抗炎作用,最理想的是降低内脏高敏感性的不同方法似乎是合理的。在本研究中,我们比较了用于治疗儿童消化不良的四种最常用药物的疗效。方法。169名年龄在2至16岁之间的患者纳入了这项临床试验研究,其中47.3%为男性,52.7%为女性,经诊断为功能性消化不良。然后给每位患者使用一种药物;奥美拉唑、法莫替丁、雷尼替丁或西咪替丁,为期4周。从治疗开始后2周和6周对患者进行随访。结果。这些患者中药物的分布情况如下;21.9%使用西咪替丁,21.3%使用法莫替丁,30.8%使用奥美拉唑,26%使用雷尼替丁,所有症状缓解的患者比例分别为:西咪替丁为21.6%,法莫替丁为44.4%,奥美拉唑为53.8%,西咪替丁为43.2%(P = 0.024)。在开始药物治疗后的2周和6周随访中,未发现药物引起的副作用。结论。如果将治愈定义为经过4周治疗后所有症状缓解,我们的研究结果表明,奥美拉唑在治疗功能性消化不良方面优于雷尼替丁、法莫替丁和西咪替丁。