Suppr超能文献

使用磁共振成像评估三维肩胛盂结构

Evaluation of three-dimensional glenoid structure using MRI.

作者信息

Inui H, Sugamoto K, Miyamoto T, Machida A, Hashimoto J, Nobuhara K

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Suita City, Japan.

出版信息

J Anat. 2001 Sep;199(Pt 3):323-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19930323.x.

Abstract

The tilting angle and the shape of the glenoid cavity are considered to relate closely to shoulder stability. They are also important when planning arthroplasty and developing new designs. This study examines the glenoid cavity using 3-dimensional MRI. Forty volunteers (20 men, 20 women; average age 21.4; range 18-35 y) were enrolled in the study. The tilting angles of the glenoid bone were measured in 5 consecutive axial planes perpendicular to the glenoidal long axis. Cross sections were divided into 3 types (concave, flat, convex) according to the shape on each plane. The average tilting angles for the 5 planes from the bottom to the top were 3.3+/-4.1, 1.4+/-3.8. -0.6+/-1.9, -1.4+/-3.3, and -6.2+/-3.3 degrees anteriorly, indicating that the 3-dimensional bony structure of the glenoid was twisted anteriorly to posteriorly. Images on the bottom plane consisted of 82.5 % concave type, 15% flat type and 2.5% convex type, while only 3 cases (7.5%) showed concave at the top plane. The shape of the glenoid cavity is thought to be conducive to glenohumeral motion and stability.

摘要

关节盂的倾斜角度和形状被认为与肩部稳定性密切相关。在规划关节置换术和研发新设计时,它们也很重要。本研究使用三维磁共振成像(MRI)对关节盂进行检查。40名志愿者(20名男性,20名女性;平均年龄21.4岁;年龄范围18 - 35岁)参与了该研究。在垂直于关节盂长轴的5个连续轴向平面上测量关节盂骨的倾斜角度。根据每个平面上的形状,将横截面分为3种类型(凹形、扁平形、凸形)。从底部到顶部的5个平面的平均倾斜角度分别为前倾角3.3±4.1度、1.4±3.8度、 - 0.6±1.9度、 - 1.4±3.3度和 - 6.2±3.3度,这表明关节盂的三维骨质结构从前向后呈扭转状。底部平面的图像中,82.5%为凹形,15%为扁平形,2.5%为凸形,而在顶部平面仅有3例(7.5%)显示为凹形。关节盂的形状被认为有利于盂肱关节的运动和稳定性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of three-dimensional glenoid structure using MRI.
J Anat. 2001 Sep;199(Pt 3):323-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19930323.x.
2
Glenoid shape in atraumatic posterior instability of the shoulder.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Oct(403):87-92. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200210000-00014.
3
Glenohumeral relationship in maximum elevation.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Oct;36(8):755-61. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1257-y. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
4
[Analysis of three-dimensional motion of the scapula and the glenohumeral joint].
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1992 Jul;66(7):675-87.
5
Shoulder Bone Geometry Affects the Active and Passive Axial Rotational Range of the Glenohumeral Joint.
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3010-3019. doi: 10.1177/0363546517716926. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
6
Morphology of the scapula relative to the reverse shoulder prosthesis.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009 Aug;17(2):146-50. doi: 10.1177/230949900901700204.
7
Measurement of the Glenoid Track In Vivo as Investigated by 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis Using Open MRI.
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1290-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546514527406. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
About the variability of the shape of the glenoid cavity.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2004 Feb;26(1):54-9. doi: 10.1007/s00276-003-0167-1. Epub 2003 Sep 19.
10
Quantitative assessment and characterization of glenoid bone loss in a spectrum of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Dec;100(3):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0406-3. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Finding the Truth: Cadaver and CT scan Study of Differences in Glenoid Width Size in the Indian Population.
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Oct;14(10):270-274. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i10.4886.
3
Glenoid Version Assessment When the CT Field of View Does Not Permit the Friedman Method: The Robertson Method.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 May 10;10(5):23259671221083589. doi: 10.1177/23259671221083589. eCollection 2022 May.
4
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2020 May 21;4:2471549220926826. doi: 10.1177/2471549220926826. eCollection 2020.
6
Difference in glenoid retroversion between two-dimensional axial computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed images.
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 May 21;23(2):71-79. doi: 10.5397/cise.2020.00122. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Exploring Alternative Sites for Glenoid Component Fixation Through Three-Dimensional Digitization of the Glenoid Vault: An Anatomic Analysis.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Dec;4(12):e20.00199-9. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00199.
8
CT-Based 3D Printing of the Glenoid Prior to Shoulder Arthroplasty: Bony Morphology and Model Evaluation.
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Oct;32(5):816-826. doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00177-4.
9
Multilevel glenoid morphology and retroversion assessment in Walch B2 and B3 types.
Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Jun;48(6):907-914. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3095-1. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
10
Modified Friedman technique: a new proposed method of measuring glenoid version in the setting of glenohumeral dysplasia.
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Nov;48(12):1779-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4196-7. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):595-8. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90096-4.
2
The glenoid notch and the shape of the glenoid cavity of the scapula.
J Anat. 1997 Oct;191 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):475. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19130475.x.
3
The glenoid notch and its relation to the shape of the glenoid cavity of the scapula.
J Anat. 1997 Apr;190 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):457-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19030457.x.
5
UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Mar-Apr(155):7-20.
7
Dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1971;42(6):491-505. doi: 10.3109/17453677108989066.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验