Dolmans D H, Wolfhagen I H, van der Vleuten C P, Wijnen W H
Department of Educational Development and Research, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):884-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00915.x.
Problem-based learning (PBL) has gained a foothold within many schools in higher education as a response to the problems faced within traditional education.
Working with PBL tutorial groups is assumed to have positive effects on student learning. Several studies provide empirical evidence that PBL stimulates cognitive effects and leads to restructuring of knowledge and enhanced intrinsic interest in the subject matter. However, staff members do not always experience the positive effects of group work which they had hoped for. When confronted with problems in group work, such as students who only maintain an appearance of being actively involved and students who let others do the work, teachers all too often implement solutions which can be characterized as teacher- directed rather than student-directed. Teachers tend to choose solutions which are familiar from their own experience during professional training, i.e. using the teacher-directed model. These solutions are not effective in improving group work and the negative experiences persist.
It is argued that teachers should hold on to the underlying educational philosophy when solving problems arising from group work in PBL, by choosing actions which are consistent with the student-directed view of education in PBL.
基于问题的学习(PBL)作为对传统教育所面临问题的一种回应,已在许多高等院校站稳脚跟。
与PBL辅导小组合作被认为对学生学习有积极影响。多项研究提供了实证证据,表明PBL能激发认知效应,促使知识重构,并增强对学科内容的内在兴趣。然而,工作人员并非总能体验到他们所期望的小组合作的积极效果。当面对小组合作中的问题时,比如学生只是表面上积极参与,以及学生让他人代劳等情况,教师常常采取的解决方案可被描述为教师主导而非学生主导。教师倾向于选择他们在专业培训期间从自身经验中熟悉的解决方案,即采用教师主导模式。这些解决方案在改善小组合作方面并无成效,负面体验依然存在。
有人认为,教师在解决PBL小组合作中出现的问题时,应秉持潜在的教育理念,选择与PBL中以学生为导向的教育观相一致的行动。