Grasl Matthaeus C, Kremser Karl, Breckwoldt Jan, Gleiss Andreas
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna, Teaching Center, Vienna, Austria.
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Feb 17;37(1):Doc8. doi: 10.3205/zma001301. eCollection 2020.
Problem-based learning (PBL) is an essential element of the curriculum of the Medical University of Vienna (MUV) and is performed in an eight steps model with: clarifying, defining, analysing, shifting & sorting, identifying learning objectives, going to learn and coming back to talk and feedback. With an annual intake of up to 740 students the MUV has to recruit PBL tutors from various academic backgrounds including undergraduate near-peer students. Therefore, we were interested to see whether a tutor's academic background had an influence on the resulting PBL sessions as reflected by the percentage of learning objectives (LOs) which were actually achieved in relation to the intended LOs. For each PBL session "intended learning objectives" (ILOs) were defined. ILOs were communicated to all tutors by means of PBL session guides in order to provide homogenous learning opportunities to all students. However, it was not mandatory to reach all ILOs. The PBL coordination regarded a range of two thirds to three quarters of ILOs as a desirable goal. For analysis we retrieved data concerning ILOs, characteristics of tutors and PBL groups from the institution's PBL quality assurance system. From 2012-2014, 216 PBL groups were facilitated by 106 tutors with different academic backgrounds. On average, 70.8% (95% CI: 69.2-72.5%) of the ILOs were achieved; MUV clinicians reached 74.3% (70.8-77.8%), MUV non-clinicians 74.2% (71.7-76.6%), external faculty (clinicians and non-clinicians) 68.6% (64.4-72.8%), and near-peer students 64.7% (61.8-67.7%). Statistically significant differences were found between near-peer students and MUV clinicians (p<.001) as well as MUV non-clinicians (p<.001). ILOs were reached within a satisfactory range. However, groups taught by near-peer students reached significantly fewer ILOs than groups taught by MUV faculty tutors. This finding raises the question whether tutor training for near-peer students should be intensified. Also, further research is needed to explore the group dynamics of student-led PBL groups.
基于问题的学习(PBL)是维也纳医科大学(MUV)课程的重要组成部分,采用八步模型进行,包括:澄清、定义、分析、转移与分类、确定学习目标、学习、返回讨论与反馈。MUV每年招收多达740名学生,必须从包括本科近龄学生在内的各种学术背景中招募PBL导师。因此,我们想了解导师的学术背景是否会对PBL课程产生影响,这可以通过实际达成的学习目标(LO)占预期LO的百分比来反映。对于每节PBL课程,都定义了“预期学习目标”(ILO)。通过PBL课程指南将ILO传达给所有导师,以便为所有学生提供均等的学习机会。然而,并不要求达成所有的ILO。PBL协调部门将达成三分之二至四分之三的ILO视为理想目标。为了进行分析,我们从该机构的PBL质量保证系统中获取了有关ILO、导师特征和PBL小组的数据。在2012年至2014年期间,106名具有不同学术背景的导师指导了216个PBL小组。平均而言,达成了70.8%(95%置信区间:69.2 - 72.5%)的ILO;MUV临床医生达成了74.3%(70.8 - 77.8%),MUV非临床医生达成了74.2%(71.7 - 76.6%),外部教员(临床医生和非临床医生)达成了68.6%(64.4 - 72.8%),近龄学生达成了64.7%(61.8 - 67.7%)。在近龄学生与MUV临床医生(p <.001)以及MUV非临床医生之间发现了统计学上的显著差异(p <.001)。ILO达成情况处于令人满意的范围内。然而,由近龄学生授课的小组达成的ILO明显少于由MUV教员导师授课的小组。这一发现引发了一个问题,即是否应加强对近龄学生的导师培训。此外,还需要进一步研究来探索学生主导的PBL小组的小组动态。