Suppr超能文献

不完全胰腺分裂:它仅仅是一种无临床意义的正常解剖变异吗?

Incomplete pancreas divisum: is it merely a normal anatomic variant without clinical implications?

作者信息

Kim M H, Lee S S, Kim C D, Lee S K, Kim H J, Park H J, Joo Y H, Kim D I, Yoo K S, Seo D W, Min Y I

机构信息

Dept. of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2001 Sep;33(9):778-85. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16521.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Incomplete pancreas divisum (PD) has been generally regarded as merely a normal anatomic variant, without clinical implications. This study compares the prevalence, symptom occurrence rate, clinical presentation, and outcomes of endoscopic treatment in patients with incomplete PD and those with complete PD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 56 patients (27 with complete PD and 29 with incomplete PD), identified from 4473 newly performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography examinations. Endoscopic treatment (minor papilla sphincterotomy with stents or nasopancreatic drainage tube insertion) was attempted in 25 symptomatic patients with PD, which was suspected to be causing the associated pancreatic diseases: acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) (n = 13; five patients with complete PD and eight with incomplete PD); chronic pancreatitis (CP) (n = 10: five patients with complete PD and five with incomplete PD); and pancreatic-type pain (PP) (n = 2; one patient with complete PD and one with incomplete PD). The mean follow-up period was 17 months (range 9 - 49 months).

RESULTS

In 12 of the 27 patients with complete PD--six with ARP, five with CP, and one with PP--it was suspected that PD was the cause of pancreatic disease. Ten of the 11 symptomatic patients with complete PD underwent successful endoscopic treatment (five with endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy and stenting, and five with endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy and endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage), and seven of these ten patients benefited from the endoscopic treatment. In 14 of the 29 patients with incomplete PD--eight with ARP, five with CP, and one with PP--it was suspected that pancreas divisum was the cause of pancreatic disease. Thirteen of the 14 symptomatic patients with incomplete PD underwent successful endoscopic treatments (six with endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy and stenting, and seven with endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy and endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage), and eight of these 13 patients experienced clinical improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence rate, symptom occurrence rate, clinical presentation, and outcomes of endoscopic treatment were similar in patients with complete PD and incomplete PD. Incomplete PD may therefore have similar clinical implications to those of complete PD.

摘要

背景与研究目的

不完全胰腺分裂(PD)通常仅被视为一种正常的解剖变异,无临床意义。本研究比较了不完全PD患者与完全PD患者的患病率、症状发生率、临床表现及内镜治疗效果。

患者与方法

研究人群包括从4473例新进行的内镜逆行胰胆管造影检查中识别出的56例患者(27例完全PD,29例不完全PD)。对25例有症状且怀疑PD导致相关胰腺疾病的患者尝试进行内镜治疗(小乳头括约肌切开术并置入支架或插入鼻胰引流管),这些疾病包括急性复发性胰腺炎(ARP)(n = 13;5例完全PD患者和8例不完全PD患者)、慢性胰腺炎(CP)(n = 10:5例完全PD患者和5例不完全PD患者)以及胰源性疼痛(PP)(n = 2;1例完全PD患者和1例不完全PD患者)。平均随访期为17个月(范围9 - 49个月)。

结果

27例完全PD患者中有12例——6例ARP、5例CP和1例PP——怀疑PD是胰腺疾病的病因。11例有症状的完全PD患者中有10例接受了成功的内镜治疗(5例采用内镜下小乳头括约肌切开术并置入支架,5例采用内镜下小乳头括约肌切开术及内镜鼻胰引流),这10例患者中有7例从内镜治疗中获益。29例不完全PD患者中有14例——8例ARP、5例CP和1例PP——怀疑胰腺分裂是胰腺疾病的病因。14例有症状的不完全PD患者中有13例接受了成功的内镜治疗(6例采用内镜下小乳头括约肌切开术并置入支架,7例采用内镜下小乳头括约肌切开术及内镜鼻胰引流),这13例患者中有8例临床症状改善。

结论

完全PD患者和不完全PD患者在内镜治疗的患病率、症状发生率、临床表现及治疗效果方面相似。因此,不完全PD可能与完全PD具有相似的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验