Dubois R W, Swetter S M, Atkins M, McMasters K, Halbert R, Miller S J, Shiell R, Kirkwood J
Protocare Sciences Inc, Santa Monica, USA.
Arch Dermatol. 2001 Sep;137(9):1217-24. doi: 10.1001/archderm.137.9.1217.
To convene a multidisciplinary panel of dermatologists, surgical oncologists, and medical oncologists to formally review available data on the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy procedure and high-dose adjuvant interferon alfa-2b therapy for patients with melanoma and to rate the "appropriateness," "inappropriateness," or "uncertainty" of the procedure and therapy to guide clinical decision making in practice.
The panel comprised 13 specialists (4 dermatologists, 4 oncologists, and 5 surgeons) from geographically diverse areas who practiced in community-based settings (n = 8) and academic institutions (n = 5). Participants were chosen based on recommendations from the relevant specialty organizations.
A formal literature review was conducted by investigators at Protocare Sciences Inc, Santa Monica, Calif, on the risks and benefits of performing an SLN biopsy in patients with stage I or II melanoma and adjuvant interferon alfa-2b therapy in patients with stage II or III disease. The MEDLINE database was searched from 1966 through July 2000, and supplemental information was obtained from various cancer societies and cancer research groups. Panel participants were queried on additional sources of relevant information. Unpublished, presented data were included in abstract form on 1 recently closed clinical trial.
The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to review and rate multiple clinical scenarios for the use of SLN biopsy and interferon alfa-2b therapy. The consensus method did not force agreement.
The panel rated 104 clinical scenarios and concluded that the SLN biopsy procedure was appropriate for primary melanomas deeper than 1.0 mm and for tumors 1 mm or less when histologic ulceration was present and/or classified as Clark level 4 or higher. The SLN biopsy was deemed inappropriate for nonulcerated Clark level 2 or 3 melanomas 0.75 mm or less in depth and uncertain in tumors 0.76 to 1.0 mm deep unless they were ulcerated or Clark level 4 or higher. Interferon alfa-2b therapy was deemed appropriate for patients with regional nodal and/or in-transit metastasis and for node-negative patients with primary melanomas deeper than 4 mm. The panel considered the use of interferon alfa-2b therapy uncertain in patients with ulcerated intermediate primary tumors (2.01-4.0 mm in depth) and inappropriate for node-negative patients with nonulcerated tumors less than 4.0 mm deep. Specialty-specific ratings were conducted as well.
召集一个由皮肤科医生、外科肿瘤学家和内科肿瘤学家组成的多学科小组,正式审查关于前哨淋巴结(SLN)活检程序和高剂量辅助性干扰素α-2b治疗黑色素瘤患者的现有数据,并对该程序和治疗的“适当性”“不适当性”或“不确定性”进行评级,以指导临床实践中的决策。
该小组由13名来自不同地理区域的专家组成(4名皮肤科医生、4名肿瘤学家和5名外科医生),他们在社区医疗机构(n = 8)和学术机构(n = 5)执业。参与者是根据相关专业组织的推荐选出的。
加利福尼亚州圣莫尼卡的Protocare Sciences公司的研究人员对I期或II期黑色素瘤患者进行SLN活检以及II期或III期疾病患者进行辅助性干扰素α-2b治疗的风险和益处进行了正式的文献综述。检索了1966年至2000年7月的MEDLINE数据库,并从各种癌症协会和癌症研究小组获得了补充信息。向小组参与者询问了其他相关信息来源。1项最近结束的临床试验中的未发表、已展示数据以摘要形式纳入。
采用兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适当性方法对SLN活检和干扰素α-2b治疗的多种临床情况进行审查和评级。该共识方法并不强制达成一致意见。
该小组对104种临床情况进行了评级,得出结论:对于深度超过1.0 mm的原发性黑色素瘤以及存在组织学溃疡和/或分类为克拉克4级或更高的1 mm或更小的肿瘤,SLN活检程序是适当的。对于深度为0.75 mm或更小的无溃疡克拉克2级或3级黑色素瘤,SLN活检被认为是不适当的;对于深度为0.76至1.0 mm的肿瘤,除非有溃疡或克拉克4级或更高,否则其SLN活检的适用性不确定。对于有区域淋巴结和/或移行转移的患者以及原发性黑色素瘤深度超过4 mm的淋巴结阴性患者,干扰素α-2b治疗被认为是适当的。该小组认为,对于有溃疡的中等深度原发性肿瘤(深度为2.01 - 4.0 mm)患者,使用干扰素α-2b治疗的适用性不确定;对于深度小于4.0 mm的无溃疡肿瘤的淋巴结阴性患者,使用该治疗是不适当的。还进行了特定专业的评级。