Lukka H, Warde P, Pickles T, Morton G, Brundage M, Souhami L
Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Urol. 2001 Aug;8(4):1314-22.
The GU Radiation Oncologists of Canada (GUROC) had a consensus meeting in November 2000 to discuss and develop consensus on four controversial areas: risk assessment of localized prostate cancer, conformal radiotherapy, role of brachytherapy in prostate cancer and combined hormonal therapy and radiotherapy for prostate cancer. The meeting was a success and resulted in consensus being achieved on a number of areas. The group agreed on three risk groupings: low risk, intermediate risk and high risk localized prostate cancer based on clinical stage, Gleason score and PSA level. The participants agreed that based on available toxicity data from randomized controlled trials, conformal treatment techniques should be offered to patients receiving prostatic radiotherapy. Consensus was reached on the role of dose escalation in each of the three risk groups and is summarized in the article. At present there is insufficient evidence from randomized clinical trials to recommend the use of brachytherapy over current other standard therapy (radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy). Non randomized published studies show promising short and intermediate term results. Where ever possible patients should be approached about participation in ongoing RCT's evaluating brachytherapy versus current other standard therapy. Outside a clinical trial the participants felt permanent seed implants should be considered an acceptable treatment option for appropriate patients with low risk prostate cancer. Based on randomized controlled trials the group agreed that patients with high risk disease should be treated with prolonged (up to 2-3 years) adjuvant hormonal therapy. Part of this hormonal treatment may be given in a neoadjuvant fashion. The group agreed that adjuvant hormones should not be routinely used in low and intermediate risk patients. Neoadjuvant hormones have been demonstrated to improve outcome in patients with bulky tumors. The role of neoadjuvant hormones in other patients with intermediate and low risk prostate cancer is unclear and will be clarified with the publication of recently completed studies. The consensus meeting strongly endorsed continued accrual to current studies investigating clinically relevant questions.
加拿大泌尿生殖系统放射肿瘤学家组织(GUROC)于2000年11月召开了一次共识会议,以讨论四个有争议的领域并达成共识:局限性前列腺癌的风险评估、适形放疗、近距离放疗在前列腺癌中的作用以及前列腺癌的联合激素治疗与放疗。会议取得了成功,并在多个领域达成了共识。该组织基于临床分期、 Gleason评分和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平,对局限性前列腺癌达成了三个风险分组的共识:低风险、中风险和高风险。参与者一致认为,根据随机对照试验提供的毒性数据,应向接受前列腺放疗的患者提供适形治疗技术。文章总结了在三个风险组中剂量递增的作用所达成的共识。目前,随机临床试验中没有足够的证据推荐使用近距离放疗而非当前的其他标准治疗(根治性前列腺切除术或外照射放疗)。非随机发表的研究显示了有前景的短期和中期结果。只要有可能,就应向患者介绍参与正在进行的评估近距离放疗与当前其他标准治疗的随机对照试验。在临床试验之外,参与者认为对于合适的低风险前列腺癌患者,永久性粒子植入应被视为一种可接受的治疗选择。基于随机对照试验,该组织一致认为,高风险疾病患者应接受延长(长达2 - 3年)的辅助激素治疗。这种激素治疗的一部分可以采用新辅助治疗方式。该组织一致认为,辅助激素不应常规用于低风险和中风险患者。新辅助激素已被证明可改善肿瘤体积较大患者的治疗效果。新辅助激素在其他中低风险前列腺癌患者中的作用尚不清楚,随着最近完成的研究的发表将会得到阐明。共识会议强烈支持继续为当前研究招募受试者,以调查临床相关问题。