Suppr超能文献

一组慢性支气管肺疾病患者三种运动试验的比较(作者译)

[Comparison of three exercise tests in a group of patients with chronic broncho-pulmonary disease (author's transl)].

作者信息

Romero Colomer P, Schrijen F

出版信息

Bull Physiopathol Respir (Nancy). 1975 Mar-Apr;11(2):203-13.

PMID:1156718
Abstract

In a group of 26 patients with various broncho-pulmonary diseases, the results of three types of exercise were compared : maximum supported power (PMS), maximum supported power + 20 W, and maximum tolerated power (PMT). The two first ones were made at constant power, the last one at increasing power (by 30 W, during three minutes). The comparison of the results indicates that there was no significant difference between the variables measured during PMT and PMS +20 W (power, oxygen uptake, cardiac frequency, oxygen pulse, ventilation). The changes in oxygen uptake, cardiac frequency, and ventilation, as the power increased, were not significantly different in the three types of exercise. In this group of patients, mean PMT was 121 W, mean PMS was 98 W, and the ratio PMS/PMT was thus 81%. To determine PMT first reduced the number of exercise-tests necessary to measure PMS (two or three tests depending on the patient).

摘要

在一组26名患有各种支气管肺部疾病的患者中,比较了三种运动类型的结果:最大支撑功率(PMS)、最大支撑功率+20瓦以及最大耐受功率(PMT)。前两种是在恒定功率下进行的,最后一种是在功率递增(三分钟内增加30瓦)的情况下进行的。结果比较表明,在PMT和PMS +20瓦期间测量的变量(功率、摄氧量、心率、氧脉搏、通气)之间没有显著差异。随着功率增加,三种运动类型中摄氧量、心率和通气的变化没有显著差异。在这组患者中,平均PMT为121瓦,平均PMS为98瓦,因此PMS/PMT的比率为81%。首先确定PMT减少了测量PMS所需的运动测试次数(根据患者情况为两到三次测试)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验