Bubalo J, Seelig F, Karbowicz S, Maziarz R T
Department of Pharmacy Services, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201, USA.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(8):439-45. doi: 10.1016/s1083-8791(01)80011-2.
A prospective open-label trial was performed to compare the efficacy of dolasetron with that of ondansetron or granisetron (standard therapy) for prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose chemotherapy with or without total body irradiation followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In a university teaching hospital setting, 62 patients were randomized to receive either dolasetron 100 mg daily or standard doses of ondansetron or granisetron. In addition to objective data such as number of episodes of emesis and quantity of rescue antiemetics required, 100 mm visual analogue scales were used to rate nausea, appetite, and changes in taste. A post-hoc subgroup analysis was performed between groups of patients that were matched for conditioning regimens. Sixty-five percent of the dolasetron-treated patients and 87% of patients in the standard therapy group achieved a major or complete response (P < .05) based on emetic episodes and nausea score. Patients in the standard therapy group used fewer rescue antiemetics and also rated more favorably on selected questions of the visual analogue scale. No differences in safety parameters or adverse effects were reported. At doses prescribed in this study, dolasetron was less effective than granisetron or ondansetron in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose chemotherapy/total body irradiation followed by HSCT.
进行了一项前瞻性开放标签试验,比较多潘立酮与昂丹司琼或格拉司琼(标准疗法)在预防与高剂量化疗伴或不伴全身照射后造血干细胞移植(HSCT)相关的恶心和呕吐方面的疗效。在一所大学教学医院环境中,62例患者被随机分配接受每日100mg多潘立酮或标准剂量的昂丹司琼或格拉司琼。除了呕吐发作次数和所需救援性止吐药数量等客观数据外,还使用100mm视觉模拟量表对恶心、食欲和味觉变化进行评分。对接受相同预处理方案的患者组进行了事后亚组分析。基于呕吐发作次数和恶心评分,65%接受多潘立酮治疗的患者和87%标准治疗组患者达到主要或完全缓解(P<0.05)。标准治疗组患者使用的救援性止吐药较少,并且在视觉模拟量表的选定问题上评分也更有利。未报告安全参数或不良反应方面的差异。在本研究规定的剂量下,多潘立酮在预防与高剂量化疗/全身照射后HSCT相关的恶心和呕吐方面不如格拉司琼或昂丹司琼有效。