Dörfer C E, Schriever A, Heidemann D, Staehle H J, Pioch T
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Ruprecht Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Adhes Dent. 2001 Summer;3(2):169-75.
To clinically measure the influence of rubber-dam on the proximal contact strength after its reconstruction with tooth-colored restorations.
The frictional forces during the removal of a metal strip from the proximal contact area were taken as measure for the proximal contact strengths of 46 restorations (35 ceramic inlays, 11 direct composite restorations). The teeth were separated with a rubber-dam and wedged thoroughly during the complete reconstruction procedure according to the multiple wedging technique. The proximal contact strengths were measured immediately before and immediately after removing the rubber-dam.
The contact strengths were statistically significantly lower immediately after the removal of the rubber-dam (1.07+/-0.82N) compared to the situation with the rubber-dam (1.99+/-1.21N). The amount of the reduction after removing the rubber-dam was statistically significantly higher between the second premolar and the first molar (1.45+/-1.06N) compared to the contacts between the canines and the first premolar (0.32+/-0.44N) and the first and second premolar (0.59+/-0.77N). No influence of the restorative material, the use and localization of retainers, localization of the restoration, or number of teeth under the rubber-dam was detectable.
Rubber-dam is recommended for adhesive restorations as it is helpful for achieving good adhesion between the tooth and restorative materials. Nevertheless, the application of rubber-dam seems to be a factor which complicates the reconstruction of adequate proximal contacts.
临床测量橡皮障对用牙齿颜色修复体重建后的邻面接触强度的影响。
将从邻面接触区域移除金属条时的摩擦力作为46个修复体(35个陶瓷嵌体,11个直接复合树脂修复体)邻面接触强度的测量指标。根据多重楔入技术,在整个重建过程中用橡皮障隔离牙齿并彻底楔入。在移除橡皮障之前和之后立即测量邻面接触强度。
与使用橡皮障时的情况(1.99±1.21N)相比,移除橡皮障后立即测得的接触强度在统计学上显著降低(1.07±0.82N)。与尖牙和第一前磨牙之间(0.32±0.44N)以及第一和第二前磨牙之间(0.59±0.77N)的接触相比,第二前磨牙和第一磨牙之间移除橡皮障后的降低量在统计学上显著更高(1.45±1.06N)。未检测到修复材料、固位体的使用和位置、修复体的位置或橡皮障下牙齿数量的影响。
推荐在粘结修复中使用橡皮障,因为它有助于在牙齿和修复材料之间实现良好的粘结。然而,橡皮障的应用似乎是一个使重建足够邻面接触变得复杂的因素。