Suppr超能文献

衡量记忆诊所使用者的意见:患者、亲属及全科医生。

Measuring the opinions of memory clinic users: patients, relatives and general practitioners.

作者信息

van Hout H P, Vernooij-Dassen M J, Hoefnagels W H, Grol R P

机构信息

Centre for Quality of Care Research, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Sep;16(9):846-51. doi: 10.1002/gps.411.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The opinions of memory clinic users are important to assess the value of memory clinics.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the quality of care of an outpatient memory clinic for the elderly as perceived by patients, their relatives and general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS

An observational study was conducted to measure the opinions of the users of a typical outpatient memory clinic. Opinions on five aspects were measured: (1) communication of the results, (2) provision of diagnostic information, (3) attitude of the clinicians, (4) usefulness of the medical assessment, and (5) information and advice to relatives. Patients and relatives were both interviewed with a dementia care satisfaction questionnaire. The GPs' opinions were derived with a self-constructed questionnaire.

RESULTS

On 105 consecutive assessments, 101 opinions of GPs, 81 of caregivers and 31 of patients were recorded. Positive opinions were recorded on the way the results were communicated, the usefulness of the assessment and attitude of the clinicians. In contrast to GPs and relatives, patients were less positive about the clarity of the diagnostic information received. Both relatives and GPs were negative on information and advice to relatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients, caregivers and GPs had positive opinions about the diagnostic value of the memory clinic. Quality improvement could focus on the clarity of the diagnostic information for patients and on better advice to relatives.

摘要

背景

记忆门诊使用者的意见对于评估记忆门诊的价值很重要。

目的

衡量患者、其亲属及全科医生(GP)对一家老年门诊记忆诊所护理质量的看法。

方法

开展一项观察性研究,以衡量一家典型门诊记忆诊所使用者的意见。对五个方面的意见进行了衡量:(1)结果沟通;(2)诊断信息提供;(3)临床医生态度;(4)医学评估的有用性;(5)给亲属的信息与建议。使用痴呆护理满意度问卷对患者和亲属进行了访谈。全科医生的意见通过自行编制的问卷得出。

结果

在连续105次评估中,记录了101份全科医生的意见、81份护理人员的意见和31份患者的意见。在结果沟通方式、评估的有用性和临床医生态度方面记录到了积极意见。与全科医生和亲属不同,患者对所获诊断信息的清晰度评价没那么积极。亲属和全科医生对给亲属的信息与建议都持负面态度。

结论

患者、护理人员和全科医生对记忆诊所的诊断价值持积极意见。质量改进可侧重于提高向患者提供诊断信息的清晰度,以及更好地为亲属提供建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验