Suppr超能文献

三方痴呆诊断对话中权力动态的语言特征。

Linguistic features of power dynamics in triadic dementia diagnostic conversations.

机构信息

Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.020. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine linguistic expressions of power during dementia diagnosis disclosure.

METHODS

Videotapes of dementia diagnosis disclosure sessions were reviewed to examine linguistic features of 86 physician-patient-companion triads. Verbal dominance and pronoun use were measured as indications of power.

RESULTS

Physicians dominated the conversation, speaking 83% of the total time. Patients spoke more than companions (10% versus 6%). Dementia status was only related to the amount of time companions spent talking. Physicians used fewer first person singular and more first person plural pronouns than patients and companions. Power indices did not predict anxiety, depression, or satisfaction with the medical visit.

CONCLUSION

During the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis, physicians tend to dominate the conversation, exerting their social status through a variety of linguistic features. Patients and companions are not more distressed or dissatisfied as a result and exert their own subtle attempts to assert their role in the conversation.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Recognition of a hierarchical structure within healthcare interactions may be the first step toward maximizing patient outcomes. Evaluating patient expectations and preferences regarding physician communication style may be the most effective way of promoting patient-centered healthcare communication.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨痴呆诊断披露过程中的权力语言表达。

方法

对痴呆诊断披露会议的录像进行了回顾,以检查 86 个医生-患者-同伴三人组的语言特征。言语主导地位和代词使用被作为权力的指标进行测量。

结果

医生主导了对话,占总时间的 83%。患者比同伴(10%对 6%)说话多。痴呆状况仅与同伴交谈的时间长短有关。医生使用的第一人称单数代词比患者和同伴少,而使用的第一人称复数代词则更多。权力指数并不能预测焦虑、抑郁或对医疗访问的满意度。

结论

在痴呆诊断披露过程中,医生往往主导对话,通过各种语言特征来发挥其社会地位。患者和同伴并没有因此而感到更加痛苦或不满,而是通过微妙的方式努力在对话中维护自己的角色。

实践意义

认识到医疗保健互动中的等级结构可能是实现患者结果最大化的第一步。评估患者对医生沟通方式的期望和偏好可能是促进以患者为中心的医疗保健沟通的最有效方式。

相似文献

1
Linguistic features of power dynamics in triadic dementia diagnostic conversations.
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.020. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
2
Discourse Features Among Providers, Patients, and Companions and Their Effect on Outcomes of Dementia Diagnosis Disclosure.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jun 14;74(5):756-763. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx154.
3
Are you talking to me?! An exploration of the triadic physician-patient-companion communication within memory clinics encounters.
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):381-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
4
"Speaking-for" and "speaking-as": pseudo-surrogacy in physician-patient-companion medical encounters about advanced cancer.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jul;96(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
5
Patient-centered communication during the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010 Sep;25(6):513-20. doi: 10.1177/1533317510372924. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
6
Physician-elderly patient-companion communication and roles of companions in Japanese geriatric encounters.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2307-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.071. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
8
Characteristics and Correlates of Word Use in Physician-Patient Communication.
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Oct;50(5):664-677. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9792-x.
9
A tool to strengthen the older patient-companion partnership in primary care: results from a pilot study.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb;62(2):312-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12639. Epub 2014 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Triadic Communication in Medical Encounters Including Individuals With Dementia: A Scoping Review.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2024;38(2):213-225. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000626. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
The Hungarian hubris syndrome.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 24;17(8):e0273226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273226. eCollection 2022.
4
Clinician Word Use in Dementia Evaluation Reports as a Function of Cognitive Impairment.
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2020 Oct 22;6:2333721420961888. doi: 10.1177/2333721420961888. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Clinician-patient communication during the diagnostic workup: The ABIDE project.
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019 Jul 29;11:520-528. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.06.001. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3476-3481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811987116. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
Patterns of interactions among patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, their caregivers, and healthcare providers during symptom discussions.
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Oct;26(10):3497-3506. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4202-5. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Third Party Interaction in the Medical Context: Code-switching and Control.
J Pragmat. 2015 Jul;84:154-171. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.009.
10
Diagnostic communication in the memory clinic: a conversation analytic perspective.
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(12):1123-30. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.1003289. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

本文引用的文献

1
"We'll do this together": the role of the first person plural in fostering partnership in patient-physician relationships.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Mar;25(3):186-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1178-3. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
2
Disclosure of the diagnosis of dementia.
Alzheimers Dement. 2007 Oct;3(4):404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
3
Reaction to a dementia diagnosis in individuals with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Mar;56(3):405-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01600.x. Epub 2008 Jan 5.
4
The language of online leadership: gender and youth engagement on the internet.
Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):436-49. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.436.
6
Disclosing a dementia diagnosis: a review of opinion and practice, and a proposed research agenda.
Gerontologist. 2004 Apr;44(2):149-58. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.2.149.
7
Doctor-patient communication: a comparison of the USA and Japan.
Fam Pract. 2003 Jun;20(3):276-82. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg308.
9
Analyzing cockpit communications: the links between language, performance, error, and workload.
Hum Perf Extrem Environ. 2000 Oct;5(1):63-8. doi: 10.7771/2327-2937.1007.
10
Measuring the opinions of memory clinic users: patients, relatives and general practitioners.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Sep;16(9):846-51. doi: 10.1002/gps.411.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验