Kersten S, Lutz F, Schüpbach P
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):127-31.
This in vitro study determined the penetration depth of a fissure sealant into an empty fissure system and into a conditioned enamel surface, using different sealing procedures.
48 extracted, non-carious human molars were sealed with the unfilled sealant (Heliobond) using the enamel adhesive technique (35% phosphoric acid gel, 120 s etching time, bond application, light-curing for 60 s). The following factors were tested in comparison to the control group (1): influence of a precuring time lapse of 20 s after sealant application (2); ultrasound application with a plastic tip during the etching procedure (3); a wetting agent in an acid vehicle (4); enamel drying with acetone after the etching procedure (5); and finally, the combination of ultrasound during etching; a drying procedure with acetone; and a 20 s precuring time lapse (all applied to the same sample). The sealed teeth were sectioned and evaluated by conventional light microscopy to determine the penetration depth into the fissure, and by confocal laser microscopy to investigate the quality of the adhesion zone.
Strict adherence to a specified penetration time, an intensified etching procedure with ultrasound, and the use of a drying procedure with acetone each showed a positive effect on the fissure penetration depth of the sealant and on the adhesion zone. The combination of these measures improved significantly the quality of the fissure sealing. Penetration depth increased to 92% of the fissure depth. From 95-100% of the total length of the analyzed adhesion zone shows excellent tags of sealant in the conditioned enamel surface.
Simple changes in the application technique of fissure sealants, such as ultrasonic treatment during etching procedure and drying the etched fissure system by acetone, improved the quality of the fissure sealing, which is a noninvasive preventive measure.
本体外研究使用不同的封闭程序,测定窝沟封闭剂进入空的窝沟系统以及经酸蚀处理的釉质表面的渗透深度。
采用釉质黏结技术(35%磷酸凝胶,蚀刻时间120秒,涂覆黏结剂,光固化60秒),用未填充的封闭剂(Heliobond)对48颗拔除的无龋人类磨牙进行封闭。与对照组(1)相比,测试了以下因素:封闭剂涂覆后20秒预固化时间的影响(2);蚀刻过程中使用塑料尖端进行超声处理(3);酸蚀剂中添加湿润剂(4);蚀刻后用丙酮干燥釉质(5);最后,蚀刻过程中超声处理、丙酮干燥处理以及20秒预固化时间的组合(均应用于同一样本)。将封闭后的牙齿切片,通过传统光学显微镜评估封闭剂进入窝沟的渗透深度,并通过共聚焦激光显微镜研究黏附区域的质量。
严格遵守规定的渗透时间、超声强化蚀刻程序以及使用丙酮干燥程序,对封闭剂的窝沟渗透深度和黏附区域均显示出积极影响。这些措施的组合显著提高了窝沟封闭的质量。渗透深度增加到窝沟深度的92%。在经酸蚀处理的釉质表面,分析的黏附区域总长度中95 - 100%显示出封闭剂的良好微突。
窝沟封闭剂应用技术的简单改变,如蚀刻过程中的超声处理以及用丙酮干燥蚀刻后的窝沟系统,改善了窝沟封闭的质量,这是一种非侵入性的预防措施。