Suppr超能文献

光滑牙釉质表面密封后牙刷/牙膏耐磨性的实验室评估。

Laboratory evaluation of toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion resistance after smooth enamel surface sealing.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dental and Oral Medicine, Philipps University Marburg, Georg-Voigt-Str. 3, 35037, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):765-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0771-8. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The use of dental sealants has been extended to smooth enamel surfaces. The present study was conducted to test the in vitro performance of four sealants with different characteristics (highly and lowly filled, self-etching features).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty human teeth (lower incisors and premolars) were randomly divided into following sealant test groups: ProSeal(TM), LightBond(TM), OrthoSolo(TM), and Seal&Protect(®). Twenty untreated teeth served as a control group. Tooth brushing was conducted for a period of time simulating 12, 18, and 24 months. During the toothbrush abrasion protocol, the specimens were subjected to thermal and acidic challenge. Sealant thickness was determined with μCT imaging, and qualitative and quantitative surface effects were investigated using stereo microscopy and raster electron microscopy, respectively. Data were subjected to t test or Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney tests (alpha, 5%).

RESULTS

The wear behavior and film integrity of highly filled sealants were superior to lowly filled sealants. Even after 1 year of tooth brushing, significant surface deterioration with deleterious loss of enamel and discoloration was observed in all tested materials (χ(2) = 15.349; P = 0.004). The size of the observed defects increased over time.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the application of sealants on smooth enamel surfaces should be limited to special indications, and their usefulness has to be revisited.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on the results of this in vitro study, the general overall application of enamel sealants needs to be questioned.

摘要

目的

已将牙釉质封闭剂的用途扩展到光滑的牙釉质表面。本研究旨在测试具有不同特性(高填充和低填充、自酸蚀)的四种封闭剂的体外性能。

材料和方法

将 80 个人类牙齿(下切牙和前磨牙)随机分为以下封闭剂测试组:ProSeal(TM)、LightBond(TM)、OrthoSolo(TM)和 Seal&Protect(®)。20 颗未经处理的牙齿作为对照组。进行了一段时间的刷牙,模拟了 12、18 和 24 个月。在牙刷磨损协议期间,对标本进行了热和酸性挑战。使用μCT 成像确定封闭剂厚度,并使用立体显微镜和光栅电子显微镜分别对定性和定量表面效果进行研究。数据采用 t 检验或 Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney 检验(α,5%)。

结果

高填充封闭剂的磨损行为和膜完整性优于低填充封闭剂。即使经过 1 年的刷牙,所有测试材料都观察到明显的表面恶化,伴有牙釉质有害损失和变色(χ(2) = 15.349;P = 0.004)。随着时间的推移,观察到的缺陷尺寸增大。

结论

这些结果表明,在光滑的牙釉质表面应用封闭剂应仅限于特殊适应症,需要重新评估其有效性。

临床相关性

基于这项体外研究的结果,需要对牙釉质封闭剂的一般总体应用提出质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验