Urushihara Y
Department of Psychiatry, Kobe Nisi City Hospital.
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2001;103(6):480-502.
In investigation obsessive-compulsive phenomena, it is important to not only regard them as a kind of symptomatology extending across a variety of diagnostic categories on the basis of faint similarities of symptoms from the cross-sectional point of view, but also to take into account how the psychopathology of a nuclear form of severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is different from a neurotic form from the vertical-sectional point of view. In this paper, the psychopathological features of 3 cases of Zwangskrankheit and primary obsessional slowness, which are considered to be nuclear forms of severe OCD, are reported. We suggest that 'obsessive-compulsive pseudophobia' lies behind Zwangskrankheit, and 'obsessive-compulsive depersonalization' lies behind primary obsessional slowness. In both disorders, a peculiar form of avoidance behavior, called 'pathological access to safety signal' was observed in which dangerous situations were avoided by taking no other action other than a determined one. Thus never making a mistake was stressed in their actions which is a feature of adherence to extra-orderliness. Therefore, a patient with Zwangskrankheit lives a restricted life according to strict rules characteristic of ritualization of one's whole life, while a patient with primary obsessional slowness acts according to the principle of miticulousness. Thus we considered that this kind of avoidance behavior is the result of a loss of safety signal not by the existence of a danger signal. In a neurotic form of OCD, patients may attempt to superficially restore the safety signal by avoiding the danger signal. In comparing the psychopathology of OCD with agoraphobia, avoidance behavior involves space in the latter, while it is an act in the former. Obsessive-compulsive pseudophobia and obsessive-compulsive depersonalization are hypothesized to be the background of symptoms of a neurotic form of OCD, but since the patients do not experience them as phenomena and so cannot take them into the field of consciousness, then they are likely to feel them, literally 'obsessive-compulsive.'
在对强迫现象的研究中,重要的是不仅要从横断面角度基于症状的细微相似性将其视为一种跨越多种诊断类别的症状学,还要从纵向角度考虑重度强迫症(OCD)核心形式的精神病理学与神经症形式有何不同。本文报告了3例被认为是重度OCD核心形式的强迫性神经症和原发性强迫性迟缓的精神病理学特征。我们认为,“强迫性假性恐惧症”是强迫性神经症的背后原因,“强迫性人格解体”是原发性强迫性迟缓的背后原因。在这两种障碍中,都观察到一种特殊形式的回避行为,称为“对安全信号的病理性获取”,即除了一种特定行为外不采取其他行动来避免危险情况。因此,他们的行为强调绝不犯错,这是坚持过度秩序性的一个特征。因此,患有强迫性神经症的患者按照一生仪式化的严格规则过着受限的生活,而患有原发性强迫性迟缓的患者则按照谨小慎微的原则行事。因此,我们认为这种回避行为是安全信号缺失的结果,而非存在危险信号所致。在神经症形式的OCD中,患者可能试图通过回避危险信号来表面上恢复安全信号。在比较OCD与广场恐惧症的精神病理学特征时,回避行为在后者涉及空间,而在前者则是一种行为。强迫性假性恐惧症和强迫性人格解体被假设为神经症形式OCD症状的背景,但由于患者并未将其体验为现象,因此无法将其纳入意识领域,那么他们很可能会切实地感到“强迫”。