• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[普通医学指南制定:二分法算法开发问题]

[Guideline development for general medicine: the problem of dichotomized algorithm development].

作者信息

Niederstadt C J, Doering T J, Fischer G C

机构信息

Abt. Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Aug;95(8):561-6.

PMID:11575140
Abstract

Development of clinical guidelines in Germany is based on two divergent principles. One is the clinical position of individuality and clinical experience. The other is the strong adherence to the principles of evidence-based medicine and the scientific method, as demonstrated by the clear, algorithmic methodology of critical pathway development. We discuss the pros and cons of both concepts and try to find some sort of practical middle ground between the two extremes.

摘要

德国临床指南的制定基于两个不同的原则。一个是个体化和临床经验的临床立场。另一个是严格遵循循证医学原则和科学方法,这体现在关键路径制定的清晰、算法化方法上。我们讨论了这两种理念的优缺点,并试图在这两个极端之间找到某种实际的中间立场。

相似文献

1
[Guideline development for general medicine: the problem of dichotomized algorithm development].[普通医学指南制定:二分法算法开发问题]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Aug;95(8):561-6.
2
[Experiences from practical guideline development--proposal of a more standardized guideline development process].[实践指南制定的经验——关于更标准化指南制定流程的提议]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2003;97(6):415-9.
3
[Practice guidelines in rehabilitation: infringement upon physicians' autonomy or foundation for better outcomes?].[康复实践指南:侵犯医生自主权还是实现更好治疗效果的基础?]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Oct;43(5):304-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828434.
4
Clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南
Singapore Med J. 2005 Dec;46(12):681-6; quiz 687.
5
[Acute backache guideline clearing process. Methodology and results of formal evaluation].[急性背痛指南清理流程。正式评估的方法与结果]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Jan-Feb;141(1):11-7.
6
[Between individuality and "evidence-based medicine"--the role of the general practitioner within the scope of disease management programs].[在个体性与“循证医学”之间——全科医生在疾病管理项目范围内的作用]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2003 Jun;97(3):183-7.
7
[Methodological standards of the evidence-based approach of clinical guidelines development in Germany. Consensus between the scientific community, self-governed bodies and practice].[德国临床指南制定循证方法的方法学标准。科学界、自治机构与实践之间的共识]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Jun;94(5):330-9.
8
[Suspicion of COPD--development of an algorithm for stepwise diagnosis in primary care].[慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疑似诊断——基层医疗中逐步诊断算法的开发]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005;99(3):217-25.
9
[The significance of clinical guidelines for rehabilitation].[临床康复指南的意义]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Apr;42(2):67-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38814.
10
[Importance and possibilities of general guidelines in family practice strategies--do we need 'basic guidelines' in general practice?].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Jul;95(6):435-42.