Byram S, Fischhoff B, Embrey M, de Bruin W B, Thorne S
Department of Psychology, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Behav Med. 2001 Spring;27(1):4-14. doi: 10.1080/08964280109595767.
Twenty-five women with breast implants participated in semistructured interviews designed to reveal their "mental models" of the processes potentially causing local (i.e., nonsystemic) problems. The authors analyzed their responses in terms of an "expert model," circumscribing scientifically relevant information. Most of the women interviewed had something to say about most elements in the expert model. Nonetheless, gaps in their mental models undermined decision making about their implants. One woman misunderstood the terms used by the medical community to describe implant failure (e.g., rupture, leak, and bleed). Another exaggerated the implants' vulnerability to direct impacts, such as car accidents. Participants also overestimated their ability to detect localized problems and to select medical remedies. Although they were generally satisfied with their own implants, many participants were dissatisfied with the decision-making processes that lead to their choice. Their interviews are interpreted by the form and content of communications that women with implants need to help them manage their health decisions better.
25名隆胸女性参与了半结构化访谈,这些访谈旨在揭示她们对于可能导致局部(即非全身性)问题的过程的“心智模式”。作者依据“专家模型”对她们的回答进行分析,该模型限定了科学相关信息。大多数接受访谈的女性对专家模型中的大多数要素都有话要说。尽管如此,她们心智模式中的差距削弱了关于隆胸的决策。一名女性误解了医学界用于描述隆胸失败的术语(如破裂、渗漏和出血)。另一名女性夸大了隆胸对诸如车祸等直接撞击的脆弱性。参与者还高估了自己检测局部问题和选择医疗补救措施的能力。尽管她们总体上对自己的隆胸效果感到满意,但许多参与者对导致她们做出选择的决策过程不满意。她们的访谈通过隆胸女性需要的沟通形式和内容来解读,以帮助她们更好地管理自己的健康决策。