• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过动态血压监测评估缬沙坦80毫克与氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克的降压效果

[Antihypertensive effect of valsartan 80 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring].

作者信息

Vaïsse B, Ghobrial H, Vaur L, Poncelet P, Asmar R, Herpin D, Mallion J M

机构信息

CHU La Timone, Marseille.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2001 Aug;94(8):907-12.

PMID:11575229
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate by ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) the 24 hours antihypertensive efficacy of the fixed combination therapy, valsartan 80 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (V + H), once daily, after 6 weeks of treatment, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

STUDY DESIGN

It was a French, multicenter, double blind, randomized trial in parallel groups comparing V + H and placebo. After an initial two weeks placebo period, patients were assigned to receive either V + H or placebo for six weeks. Were eligible those with clinical arterial blood pressure, measured by sphygmomanometer, between 160/95 and 209/114 mmHg after monotherapy. A 26 hours ABPM, with Spacelabs 90,207, was done at J0 and J42 (one measurement every 15 minutes, in day time and at night). Responders were defined as a fall in day diastolic blood pressure > or = 5 mmHg and/or day diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg with ABPM.

RESULTS

123 of the 138 randomized patients had two interpretative measurements. Their average age was 59 + 10 years. 57% (78) of them were males and their average ABPM before treatment was 143 +/- 15/88 +/- 11 mmHg. With V + H, the reduction of the systolic and the diastolic blood pressure measured by ABPM, was significantly more important than with placebo (SBP: -15.4 +/- 10.9 mmHg versus -0.6 +/- 7.7 mmHg, p < 0.001; DBP: -9.1 +/- 7 mmHg versus -0.4 +/- 5.4 mmHg, p < 0.001). Pulse pressure (PP) was also significantly reduced with the combination therapy V + H, but it was not modified with placebo (-6.3 + 5.5 mmHg versus -0.2 + 4.1 mmHg, p < 0.001). ABPM responder rate was 73% with V + H versus 24% with placebo (p < 0.001). Trough/peak ratio was 80.3% for systolic blood pressure and 57.3% for diastolic blood pressure. The combination V + H was as well tolerated as placebo.

CONCLUSION

The fixed combination V + H used for treatment of hypertension, after failure of monotherapy, is very effective in reducing pulse pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, over 24 hours, homogeneously, and is as well tolerated as placebo.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过动态血压监测(ABPM)评估缬沙坦80毫克+氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克(V+H)固定复方疗法每日一次治疗6周后对轻度至中度高血压患者的24小时降压疗效。

研究设计

这是一项法国的多中心、双盲、平行组随机试验,比较V+H与安慰剂。在最初两周的安慰剂期后,患者被分配接受V+H或安慰剂治疗六周。单药治疗后用血压计测量临床动脉血压在160/95至209/114毫米汞柱之间的患者符合入选标准。在J0和J42时使用Spacelabs 90,207进行26小时的ABPM(白天和夜间每15分钟测量一次)。根据ABPM,日间舒张压下降≥5毫米汞柱和/或日间舒张压<90毫米汞柱者被定义为有反应者。

结果

138例随机分组患者中有123例进行了两次可解释测量。他们的平均年龄为59±10岁。其中57%(78例)为男性,治疗前平均ABPM为143±15/88±11毫米汞柱。使用V+H时,通过ABPM测量的收缩压和舒张压下降幅度明显大于安慰剂组(收缩压:-15.4±10.9毫米汞柱对-0.6±7.7毫米汞柱,p<0.001;舒张压:-9.1±7毫米汞柱对-0.4±5.4毫米汞柱,p<0.001)。联合治疗V+H也使脉压(PP)显著降低,但安慰剂组未改变(-6.3+5.5毫米汞柱对-0.2+4.1毫米汞柱,p<0.001)。V+H组的ABPM有反应率为73%,而安慰剂组为24%(p<0.001)。收缩压的谷峰比为80.3%,舒张压的谷峰比为57.3%。V+H联合用药的耐受性与安慰剂相当。

结论

单药治疗失败后用于治疗高血压的固定复方V+H在24小时内均匀降低脉压、收缩压和舒张压方面非常有效,且耐受性与安慰剂相当。

相似文献

1
[Antihypertensive effect of valsartan 80 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring].通过动态血压监测评估缬沙坦80毫克与氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克的降压效果
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2001 Aug;94(8):907-12.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
3
Effect of valsartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure response in elderly patients with systolic hypertension: a ValVET substudy.缬沙坦、氢氯噻嗪及其联合用药对老年收缩期高血压患者24小时动态血压反应的影响:一项ValVET子研究
Blood Press Monit. 2011 Aug;16(4):186-96. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32834944e9.
4
Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study.力滴定缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平/氢氯噻嗪对2期高血压患者动态血压的影响:EVALUATE研究
Blood Press Monit. 2009 Jun;14(3):112-20. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832a9da7.
5
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
6
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪两种固定剂量复方制剂与缬沙坦单药治疗对2或3期收缩期高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较:一项为期8周的随机、双盲、平行组试验
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.010.
7
Differential time effect profiles of amlodipine, as compared to valsartan, revealed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, self blood pressure measurements and dose omission protocol.通过动态血压监测、自我血压测量和剂量省略方案揭示的氨氯地平与缬沙坦相比的不同时间效应曲线。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;18(4):483-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00269.x.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in the initial treatment of severe hypertension.缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪联合治疗在重度高血压初始治疗中的疗效及耐受性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Aug;24(8):2303-11. doi: 10.1185/03007990802271946. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
9
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
10
Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of the fixed dose combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in essential hypertensive patients.通过24小时动态血压监测评估依那普利10毫克/尼群地平20毫克固定剂量复方制剂与氯沙坦50毫克/氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克对原发性高血压患者的降压效果比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Mar;18(3):215-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001655.