Suppr超能文献

瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼对高血压患者气管插管心血管反应影响的比较。

Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Maguire A M, Kumar N, Parker J L, Rowbotham D J, Thompson J P

机构信息

University Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jan;86(1):90-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.1.90.

Abstract

In a randomized double-blind study, we compared the effect of remifentanil and alfentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients on long-term treatment for hypertension. Forty ASA II-III patients were allocated to receive (i) remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of 0.1 microg kg min(-1) or (ii) alfentanil 10 microg kg(-1) followed by an infusion of saline; all patients received glycopyrrolate 200 microg before the study drug. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium and maintained with 1% isoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were performed after establishment of neuromuscular block. Arterial pressure and heart rate (HR) were measured non-invasively at 1 min intervals from 3 min before induction until 5 min after intubation. Systolic (SAP), diastolic and mean arterial pressure decreased significantly after induction in both groups (P<0.05). Maximum increases in mean SAP after laryngoscopy and intubation were 35 and 41 mm Hg in the remifentanil and alfentanil groups, respectively. After intubation, arterial pressure did not increase above baseline values in either group. HR remained stable after induction of anaesthesia, but increased above baseline values after intubation. Mean maximum HR was 87 beats min(-1) for the remifentanil group (12 beats min(-1) above baseline; P=0.065) and 89 beats min(-1) for the alfentanil group (15 beats min(-1) above baseline; P<0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in HR or arterial pressure at any time. There were no incidences of bradycardia. Seven patients in the remifentanil group and four in the alfentanil group received ephedrine for hypotension (i.e. SAP<100 mm Hg).

摘要

在一项随机双盲研究中,我们比较了瑞芬太尼和阿芬太尼对长期接受高血压治疗患者喉镜检查和气管插管时心血管反应的影响。40例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为II-III级的患者被分配接受:(i)瑞芬太尼0.5微克/千克,随后以0.1微克/千克·分钟的速度输注;或(ii)阿芬太尼10微克/千克,随后输注生理盐水;所有患者在给予研究药物前均接受200微克格隆溴铵。麻醉诱导采用丙泊酚和罗库溴铵,维持采用1%异氟烷和66%氧化亚氮与氧气混合。在建立神经肌肉阻滞后进行喉镜检查和气管插管。从诱导前3分钟至插管后5分钟,每隔1分钟无创测量动脉压和心率(HR)。两组诱导后收缩压(SAP)、舒张压和平均动脉压均显著下降(P<0.05)。喉镜检查和插管后,瑞芬太尼组和阿芬太尼组平均SAP的最大升高分别为35和41毫米汞柱。插管后,两组动脉压均未升高至基线值以上。麻醉诱导后HR保持稳定,但插管后高于基线值。瑞芬太尼组平均最大HR为87次/分钟(比基线高12次/分钟;P=0.065),阿芬太尼组为89次/分钟(比基线高15次/分钟;P<0.05)。两组在任何时间的HR或动脉压均无显著差异。未发生心动过缓事件。瑞芬太尼组7例患者和阿芬太尼组4例患者因低血压(即SAP<100毫米汞柱)接受了麻黄碱治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验