Suppr超能文献

在重度抑郁发作期间使用结构化自我报告评估来诊断边缘型人格障碍。

Use of structured self-report assessment to diagnose borderline personality disorder during major depressive episodes.

作者信息

Kurtz J E, Morey L C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2001 Sep;8(3):291-300. doi: 10.1177/107319110100800305.

Abstract

Diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) during episodes of major depression (MDE), although clinically important, is complicated in several respects when using self-report methods. Structured interview data were used to select a group of patients with comorbid BPD (n=21) from a sample of outpatients presenting with MDE. This group was compared with a group of MDE patients without BPD (n=24) and with a group of community controls (n=20) using self-report data from the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), the revised Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Analyses revealed that the BPD group obtained significantly higher scores on PAI and PDQ scales measuring features of BPD and on the PAI Negative Impression Management scale. The severity and type of MDE symptoms reported on the PAI and BDI did not differentiate the clinical groups. These data show that useful information for the diagnosis of BPD during depressive episodes can be gathered from self-report assessment instruments like the PAI.

摘要

在重度抑郁发作(MDE)期间诊断边缘型人格障碍(BPD),尽管在临床上很重要,但使用自我报告方法时在几个方面会变得复杂。结构化访谈数据被用于从患有MDE的门诊患者样本中挑选出一组共病BPD的患者(n = 21)。使用来自人格评估量表(PAI)、修订版人格诊断问卷(PDQ)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)的自我报告数据,将该组患者与一组无BPD的MDE患者(n = 24)以及一组社区对照(n = 20)进行比较。分析显示,BPD组在测量BPD特征的PAI和PDQ量表以及PAI负面印象管理量表上得分显著更高。PAI和BDI报告的MDE症状的严重程度和类型并未区分临床组。这些数据表明,可从PAI等自我报告评估工具中收集到抑郁发作期间BPD诊断的有用信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验