Bolard P, Quantin C, Esteve J, Faivre J, Abrahamowicz M
Registre Bourguignon des Tumeurs Digestives (Burgundy Registry of Digestive Tumors), Faculté de Médecine, 7 Bd Jeanne d'Arc 21033, Dijon Cedex, France.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):986-96. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00363-8.
The Cox model is widely used in the evaluation of prognostic factors in clinical research. In population-based studies, however, which assess long-term survival of unselected populations, relative survival models are often considered more appropriate. In both approaches, the validity of proportional hazard hypothesis should be evaluated. To explore the validity of the proportional hazard assumption in a population-based study of colon cancer, to propose non-proportional hazard relative survival models and to evaluate their utility. The use of a piecewise proportional hazard relative survival model in colon cancer has shown that the effects of most clinical prognostic factors such as age, period of diagnosis and stage are non-proportional. The non-proportional hazard relative survival models developed in this article have been found to be efficient tools for better understanding the time-dependent aspect of prognostic factors.
Cox模型在临床研究中预后因素的评估中被广泛应用。然而,在评估未选择人群长期生存情况的基于人群的研究中,相对生存模型通常被认为更合适。在这两种方法中,都应评估比例风险假设的有效性。为了探讨在基于人群的结肠癌研究中比例风险假设的有效性,提出非比例风险相对生存模型并评估其效用。在结肠癌中使用分段比例风险相对生存模型已表明,大多数临床预后因素如年龄、诊断时期和分期的影响是非比例的。本文中开发的非比例风险相对生存模型已被发现是更好理解预后因素时间依赖性方面的有效工具。