Suppr超能文献

[面部裂隙的诊断及产前处理所带来的问题]

[Problems posed by the diagnosis and prenatal management of facial clefts].

作者信息

Perrotin F, Lardy H, Marret H, Paillet C, Lansac J, Body G

机构信息

Département Gynécologie Obstétrique, Médecine Foetale et Reproduction Humaine, Hôpital Bretonneau.

出版信息

Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2001 Jun;102(3-4):143-52.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the difficulties in relation to prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate. To provide useful clue to the clinician in order to evaluate prognosis and for prenatal management of this malformation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of all cases managed in our fetal medicine unit between January 1991 and December 1999. During this study period 64 cases of fetal cleft lip and/or palate were retrospectively reviewed. From June 1995, all cases were prospectively recorded, giving us the opportunity to compare the performance of three ultrasound signs for associated secondary cleft palate.

RESULTS

The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 26 weeks. Associated ultrasound abnormalities were detected in 42% of cases. Chromosome analysis was performed in all fetuses with associated ultrasound findings and in 39% of fetuses with isolated facial clefts. All fetuses with isolated cleft were chromosomally normal, whereas 15 of the 26 with additional abnormalities had chromosomal defects. Prospective assessment of three ultrasound signs of associated secondary cleft palate was considered possible in 57% of facial clefts. Sensitivity of these signs was respectively 78% (interruption of the secondary palate midline linear echo in a sagittal view), 87% (abnormal oro-nasopharyngeal fluid flow with color Doppler imaging) and 31% for ancillary signs (amniotic fluid excess and non-visualized fetal stomach) for the prediction of associated cleft palate. Only the absence of the three signs to rule out secondary cleft palate.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate must draw attention to associated sonographic malformations. When cleft lip and/or palate is isolated, amniocentesis is recommended apart from selected cases. Secondary palate involvement is difficult to ascertain during pregnancy.

摘要

目的

确定唇腭裂产前诊断方面的困难。为临床医生评估预后及对这种畸形进行产前管理提供有用线索。

患者与方法

对1991年1月至1999年12月在我们胎儿医学科诊治的所有病例进行回顾性研究。在此研究期间,对64例胎儿唇腭裂病例进行了回顾性分析。从1995年6月起,对所有病例进行前瞻性记录,使我们有机会比较三种超声征象对相关继发腭裂的诊断效能。

结果

诊断时的平均孕周为26周。42%的病例检测到相关超声异常。对所有有相关超声表现的胎儿以及39%单纯面部裂隙的胎儿进行了染色体分析。所有单纯腭裂胎儿染色体均正常,而26例伴有其他异常的胎儿中有15例存在染色体缺陷。57%的面部裂隙病例可对相关继发腭裂的三种超声征象进行前瞻性评估。这些征象预测相关腭裂的敏感性分别为:矢状面继发腭中线线性回声中断为78%,彩色多普勒成像显示口鼻咽喉液流异常为87%,辅助征象(羊水过多和未显示胎儿胃泡)为31%。只有三种征象均不存在才能排除继发腭裂。

结论

唇腭裂的产前诊断必须关注相关的超声畸形。当唇腭裂为单纯性时,除特定病例外,建议进行羊膜腔穿刺术。孕期很难确定是否存在继发腭受累情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验