van der Wal G, van der Maas P J, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B D, van der Heide A
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum, afd. Sociale Geneeskunde, Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Sep 15;145(37):1802-6.
In the second half of 2001, an extensive study will start which will evaluate the review procedure for euthanasia in the Netherlands. Since the end of 1998, euthanasia has to be reviewed by regional review committees, which include a physician and an ethicist, in addition to a legal expert. The aim of this study is to examine whether the reporting procedure meets the aim and whether there are any points which require improvement. This study follows on from those carried out in 1990/1991 and 1995/1996, which investigated euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions (assisted suicide, termination of life without the patient's explicit request, treatment of pain and symptoms with a possible life-shortening effect, and forgoing potentially life-prolonging treatment). The study consists of an analysis of cases of death (in which the numbers and nature of various medical end-of-life decisions will be established), physician interviews (to gain insight into the context in which medical end-of-life decisions are made), a study of reported cases (to give an overview of doctors' experiences with the review committees), and a study carried out amongst the general public (around 1,500 Dutch adults will be given a written questionnaire about their opinions concerning medical end-of-life decisions and the reporting procedure). In addition to this Dutch study, a European study subsidized by the European Commission is being carried out which will examine attitudes and experiences regarding medical end-of-life decisions in six European countries (Belgium, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland). This will, for the first time, enable a true comparison to be made between the Netherlands and other countries in terms of euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions.
2001年下半年,一项广泛的研究将启动,该研究将评估荷兰的安乐死审查程序。自1998年底以来,安乐死必须由地区审查委员会进行审查,该委员会除了一名法律专家外,还包括一名医生和一名伦理学家。这项研究的目的是检查报告程序是否符合目标,以及是否有任何需要改进的地方。这项研究是在1990/1991年和1995/1996年进行的研究基础上开展的,那两项研究调查了安乐死及其他医疗临终决定(协助自杀、未经患者明确请求而终止生命、使用可能缩短生命的药物治疗疼痛和症状以及放弃可能延长生命的治疗)。该研究包括对死亡病例的分析(确定各种医疗临终决定的数量和性质)、医生访谈(以深入了解做出医疗临终决定的背景)、对报告病例的研究(概述医生与审查委员会打交道的经历)以及在普通公众中开展的一项研究(约1500名荷兰成年人将收到一份关于他们对医疗临终决定和报告程序看法的书面问卷)。除了这项荷兰的研究外,一项由欧盟委员会资助的欧洲研究也在进行,该研究将调查六个欧洲国家(比利时、丹麦,意大利、荷兰、瑞典和瑞士)对医疗临终决定的态度和经历。这将首次能够在安乐死及其他医疗临终决定方面对荷兰和其他国家进行真正的比较。