Maack C, Elter T, Nickenig G, LaRosee K, Crivaro M, Stäblein A, Wuttke H, Böhm M
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Innere Medizin III, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Oct;38(4):939-46. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01471-1.
This study investigates the effects of a change of beta-adrenergic blocking agent treatment from metoprolol to carvedilol and vice versa in patients with heart failure (HF).
Beta-blockers improve ventricular function and prolong survival in patients with HF. It has recently been suggested that carvedilol has more pronounced effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared with metoprolol. It is uncertain whether a change from one beta-blocker to the other is safe and leads to any change of left ventricular function.
Forty-four patients with HF due to ischemic (n = 17) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (n = 27) that had responded well to long-term treatment with either metoprolol (n = 20) or carvedilol (n = 24) were switched to an equivalent dose of the respective other beta-blocker. Before and six months after crossover of treatment, echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and dobutamine stress echocardiography were performed.
Six months after crossover of beta-blocker treatment, LVEF had further improved with both carvedilol and metoprolol (carvedilol: 32 +/- 3% to 36 +/- 4%; metoprolol: 27 +/- 4% to 30 +/- 5%; both p < 0.05 vs. baseline), without interindividual differences. There were no changes in either New York Heart Association functional class or any other hemodynamic parameters at rest. Dobutamine stress echocardiography revealed a more pronounced increase of heart rate after dobutamine infusion in metoprolol- compared with carvedilol-treated patients. After dobutamine infusion, LVEF increased in the carvedilol- but not in the metoprolol-treated group.
When switching treatment from one beta-blocker to the other, improvement of LVEF in patients with HF is maintained. Despite similar long-term effects on hemodynamics at rest, beta-adrenergic responsiveness is different in both treatments.
本研究调查了心力衰竭(HF)患者从美托洛尔转换为卡维地洛或反之对β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂治疗效果的影响。
β受体阻滞剂可改善HF患者的心室功能并延长生存期。最近有研究表明,与美托洛尔相比,卡维地洛对左心室射血分数(LVEF)有更显著的影响。从一种β受体阻滞剂转换为另一种是否安全以及是否会导致左心室功能的任何变化尚不确定。
44例因缺血性(n = 17)或特发性心肌病(n = 27)导致HF的患者,长期接受美托洛尔(n = 20)或卡维地洛(n = 24)治疗且反应良好,将其转换为等量的另一种β受体阻滞剂。在治疗交叉前和交叉后6个月,进行超声心动图、放射性核素心室造影和多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图检查。
β受体阻滞剂治疗交叉后6个月,卡维地洛和美托洛尔均使LVEF进一步改善(卡维地洛:32±3%至36±4%;美托洛尔:27±4%至30±5%;两者与基线相比p<0.05),且无个体差异。纽约心脏协会功能分级或任何其他静息血流动力学参数均无变化。多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图显示,与卡维地洛治疗的患者相比,美托洛尔治疗的患者在多巴酚丁胺输注后心率增加更明显。多巴酚丁胺输注后,卡维地洛治疗组的LVEF增加,而美托洛尔治疗组未增加。
当从一种β受体阻滞剂转换为另一种治疗时,HF患者的LVEF改善得以维持。尽管两种治疗对静息血流动力学的长期影响相似,但β-肾上腺素能反应性不同。