Yamaguchi T, Dorfman H D
Section of Orthopaedic Pathology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467-2490, USA.
Int J Surg Pathol. 2001 Jul;9(3):189-200. doi: 10.1177/106689690100900304.
This study attempts to define the clinicopathologic aspects of extragnathic giant cell reparative granuloma (GCRG) by contrasting it with the much better recognized GCRG of jaw bones and highlights the manifestations that are unique to the extragnathic localization. Ninety-one GCRGs of 89 patients, 22 in jaw bones and 69 in the extragnathic bones, were examined. Females were affected twice as frequently as males in both groups. The age distribution of extragnathic GCRGs overlaps that of gnathic counterparts. Small bones of the hands (17 lesions) and feet (16 lesions) were the most common sites for extragnathic lesions. The radiographic findings were nonspecific. Histology of extragnathic lesions was closely similar to that of lesions affecting the jaw. These giant cell lesions should be distinguished from giant cell tumors. Int J Surg Pathol 9(3):189-200, 2001
本研究试图通过将颌骨外巨细胞修复性肉芽肿(GCRG)与更为人熟知的颌骨GCRG进行对比,来明确其临床病理特征,并突出颌骨外定位所特有的表现。对89例患者的91个GCRG进行了检查,其中22个位于颌骨,69个位于颌骨外骨骼。两组中女性受累的频率均是男性的两倍。颌骨外GCRG的年龄分布与颌骨GCRG重叠。手部小骨(17处病变)和足部小骨(16处病变)是颌骨外病变最常见的部位。影像学表现不具有特异性。颌骨外病变的组织学与累及颌骨的病变非常相似。这些巨细胞病变应与巨细胞瘤相鉴别。《国际外科病理学杂志》9(3):189 - 200, 2001