Use of percutaneous gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes in the rehabilitation of stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the characteristics of and complications in the rehabilitation of stroke patients in whom percutaneous gastrojejunostomy (PGJ) feeding tubes have been placed.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A rehabilitation unit in a tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Stroke patients (n = 563) admitted to a tertiary care hospital over a 10-year period.

INTERVENTION

PGJ feeding tubes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Evidence of aspiration in all videofluoroscopic modified barium swallow (VMBS) studies was noted. For patients with a PGJ feeding tube, the following were recorded: stroke location; results of subsequent VMBS reports; length of time from stroke onset to PGJ feeding tube insertion; total time the PGJ feeding tube remained in situ; discharge disposition; and concurrent feeding status. Follow-up was at 1-year poststroke. Complications during the inpatient stay attributable to the PGJ feeding tube were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of all 563 (5.7%) stroke patients admitted and 28 of the 115 (24.3%) proven aspirators, as shown on VMBS studies, had a PGJ feeding tube inserted. Twenty-one of the 563 (3.7%) stroke patients were discharged to the community with PGJ feeding tubes in place. The tubes were inserted on average 37 days after stroke onset. Seventeen of all 88 (19.3%) brainstem stroke patients and 15 of all 29 (51.7%) brainstem stroke patients with documented aspiration had feeding tubes inserted, whereas only 15 of 475 (3.2%) hemispheric stroke rehabilitation patients received a tube. Eleven of 32 (34.3%) patients with a feeding tube were able to resume oral feedings at discharge; within 1 year of discharge, 24 of 32 (75%) had done so. Although there were no serious complications resulting from tube insertions, minor complications were documented in more than 50% of the cases. The tubes were associated with prolonged institutionalization in only 1 case; most patients were discharged on a home tube-feeding program.

CONCLUSIONS

PGJ feeding tubes were placed in approximately 1 of every 20 of our stroke rehabilitation patients. One third of the tubes were removed before the patients were discharged from rehabilitation and 75% were removed within 1 year. Insertion of the tubes was most common in patients with evidence of aspiration and in patients with brainstem strokes. Complications caused by the tube were minor and all patients but 1 who were discharged with feeding tubes were able to manage the home tube-feeding program.