Sakabe K, Ikeda T, Kawase A, Kumagai K, Sakai T, Tezuka N, Takami M, Nakae T, Sakata T, Noro M, Enjoji Y, Sugi K, Yamaguchi T
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Ohashi Hospital, Toho University School of Medicine, 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan.
J Electrocardiol. 2001 Oct;34(4):289-94. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2001.27849.
Noninvasive markers reflecting repolarization inhomogeneity have been proposed to be useful indices for identifying patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmias based on organic heart disease. In this study, we clarify whether or not repolarization inhomogeneity markers are useful in patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). We investigated T-wave alternans (TWA) and corrected QT-interval dispersion (QTD) in 84 consecutive patients with idiopathic VT, 90 patients with VT associated with organic heart disease (organic VT), and 87 normal individuals. VT was defined as tachycardia lasting > or =5 consecutive ventricular ectopic beats at a rate of > or =120 beats/min. TWA was positive in 20 of 84 patients (24%) with idiopathic VT, 59 of 90 patients (66%) with organic VT, and 16 of 87 normal individuals (18%). The alternans voltage was 2.6 +/- 3.1 micro V in idiopathic VT patients, 5.6 +/- 6.4 micro V in organic VT patients, and 2.9 +/- 5.7 micro V in normal individuals. QTD were 53 +/- 20 ms in idiopathic VT patients, 92 +/- 20 ms in organic VT patients, 46 +/- 18 ms in normal individuals, respectively. A positive TWA test result was seen more (P <.01) frequently, and QTD was longer (P <.01) in organic VT patients compared to normal individuals, whereas there was no difference between idiopathic VT patients and normal individuals. In addition, in patients with idiopathic VT, neither did any of these measurements differ between patients with sustained VT (lasting for > or =30 s) and those with nonsustained VT. Noninvasive markers of repolarization inhomogeneity, such as TWA and QTD, are not useful for identifying patients with idiopathic VT. Repolarization inhomogeneity may not affect to the pathogenesis of idiopathic VT.
基于器质性心脏病,反映复极不均一性的无创性标志物已被认为是识别室性心律失常高危患者的有用指标。在本研究中,我们阐明复极不均一性标志物在特发性室性心动过速(VT)患者中是否有用。我们调查了84例连续的特发性VT患者、90例伴有器质性心脏病的VT患者(器质性VT)以及87名正常个体的T波电交替(TWA)和校正QT间期离散度(QTD)。VT定义为心动过速持续≥5个连续室性早搏,心率≥120次/分钟。84例特发性VT患者中有20例(24%)TWA阳性,90例器质性VT患者中有59例(66%)TWA阳性,87名正常个体中有16例(18%)TWA阳性。特发性VT患者的电交替电压为2.6±3.1微伏,器质性VT患者为5.6±6.4微伏,正常个体为2.9±5.7微伏。特发性VT患者的QTD为53±20毫秒,器质性VT患者为92±20毫秒,正常个体为46±18毫秒。与正常个体相比,器质性VT患者TWA试验阳性结果更常见(P<.01),QTD更长(P<.01),而特发性VT患者与正常个体之间无差异。此外,在特发性VT患者中,持续性VT(持续≥30秒)患者与非持续性VT患者之间这些测量值均无差异。复极不均一性的无创性标志物,如TWA和QTD,对识别特发性VT患者无用。复极不均一性可能不影响特发性VT的发病机制。