Suppr超能文献

[中心静脉置管——总是需要超声支持吗?]

[Central venous cannulation - always with ultrasound support?].

作者信息

Brass P, Volk O, Leben J, Schregel W

机构信息

Abteilung für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, St. Josefshopsital Uerdingen, Krefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2001 Oct;36(10):619-27. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17671.

Abstract

Central Venous Cannulation - Always with Ultrasound Support?.Ultrasound guided puncture (UGP) improves success and complication rates of central venous cannulation. By some authors UGP with imaging devices are strongly recommended for all cannulations of subclavian or internal jugular veins. In order to review the current literature a computer based abstract search in Medline was performed for the period from January 1972 to May 2000 limited by the key words "catheterization, central venous catheter, internal jugular vein, subclavian vein, axillary vein, femoral vein, ultrasound, ultrasonography, Site-Rite und Smart Needle". UGP of the internal jugular vein was recommended in 29 prospective randomized studies, 21 prospective and three retrospective studies as well as in several clinical reports. UGP of the subclavian vein was supported by only 4 studies, whereas two studies did not show any improvement of puncture results with UGP. Due to the visualisation of the vessel and the cannula imaging techniques represent the "gold standard". However, with conventional Doppler devices nearly the same success rates can be obtained. It does not seem to be justified to perform every central venous cannulation with Doppler or ultrasound support. Each anaesthetist and intensive care physician should be able to perform central venous cannulation without a Doppler or ultrasound device. However, in cases of abnormal anatomy UGP can be helpful to prevent complications. Especially children, patients with coagulation disorders and physicians with limited experience in central venous cannulation can benefit from UGP.

摘要

中心静脉置管——总是需要超声辅助吗?超声引导穿刺(UGP)可提高中心静脉置管的成功率并降低并发症发生率。一些作者强烈建议,对于所有锁骨下静脉或颈内静脉置管,均应使用成像设备进行超声引导穿刺。为了回顾当前文献,我们在Medline数据库中进行了基于计算机的摘要检索,检索时间范围为1972年1月至2000年5月,检索关键词为“导管插入术、中心静脉导管、颈内静脉、锁骨下静脉、腋静脉、股静脉、超声、超声检查、Site - Rite和Smart Needle”。29项前瞻性随机研究、21项前瞻性研究和3项回顾性研究以及若干临床报告均推荐对颈内静脉进行超声引导穿刺。仅有4项研究支持对锁骨下静脉进行超声引导穿刺,而有2项研究未显示超声引导穿刺能改善穿刺结果。由于血管和导管的可视化,成像技术代表了“金标准”。然而,使用传统多普勒设备也能获得几乎相同的成功率。似乎没有理由对每例中心静脉置管都采用多普勒或超声辅助。每位麻醉医生和重症监护医生都应能够在不使用多普勒或超声设备的情况下进行中心静脉置管。然而,在解剖结构异常的情况下,超声引导穿刺有助于预防并发症。尤其是儿童、有凝血障碍的患者以及在中心静脉置管方面经验有限的医生,都能从超声引导穿刺中获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验