• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知觉负载在疏忽中的作用:随着中枢负载增加,对同侧干扰物的排除得到促进。

The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.

作者信息

Lavie N, Robertson I H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University College London, UK.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1;13(7):867-76. doi: 10.1162/089892901753165791.

DOI:10.1162/089892901753165791
PMID:11595091
Abstract

Neglect is known to produce a bias towards the ipsilesional side. Here we examined whether this bias is automatic or can be modulated by manipulating perceptual load in a relevant task [e.g., Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451-468]. Three patients with left neglect and three healthy controls made speeded choice responses to a target letter in the center of the display while attempting to ignore an irrelevant distractor presented on left or right. Perceptual load was manipulated by inducing a search for the target that appeared with another central stimulus, which was either a blob (low load) or a nontarget letter (higher load). Response competition effects from ipsilesional distractors were significantly reduced by higher load. The same increase of load, however, did not decrease distractor effects in the control group, as expected [e.g., Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of attentional selection: Efficient visual search results in inefficient rejection of distraction. Psychological Science, 8, 395-398]. These results demonstrate that ipsilesional bias in neglect is not fully automated and emphasize an additional restriction of perceptual capacity. Moreover, they supported our prediction that reduced perceptual capacity in neglect can lead to improved distractor rejection with just small increases in perceptual load.

摘要

众所周知,疏忽会导致对患侧的偏向。在此,我们研究了这种偏向是自动产生的,还是可以通过在相关任务中操纵感知负荷来调节 [例如,拉维,N.(1995年)。感知负荷是选择性注意的必要条件。《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》,21卷,451 - 468页]。三名患有左侧疏忽的患者和三名健康对照者在试图忽略呈现在左侧或右侧的无关干扰物时,对显示屏中央的目标字母做出快速选择反应。通过诱导对与另一个中央刺激同时出现的目标进行搜索来操纵感知负荷,该中央刺激要么是一个斑点(低负荷),要么是一个非目标字母(高负荷)。高负荷显著降低了来自患侧干扰物的反应竞争效应。然而,正如预期的那样 [例如,拉维,N.,& 考克斯,S.(1997年)。关于注意选择的效率:有效的视觉搜索导致对干扰的低效抑制。《心理科学》,8卷,395 - 398页],相同的负荷增加并未降低对照组中的干扰物效应。这些结果表明,疏忽中的患侧偏向并非完全自动化,并强调了感知能力的额外限制。此外,它们支持了我们的预测,即疏忽中感知能力的降低只需感知负荷稍有增加就能导致对干扰物的抑制得到改善。

相似文献

1
The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.知觉负载在疏忽中的作用:随着中枢负载增加,对同侧干扰物的排除得到促进。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1;13(7):867-76. doi: 10.1162/089892901753165791.
2
Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?右侧半球病变患者的目标驱动选择性注意:同侧视野的完整性如何?
Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):168-81. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh690. Epub 2005 Nov 29.
3
Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.中枢感知负荷不会降低顶叶偏侧忽视中患侧侧翼干扰效应。
Neuropsychology. 2008 May;22(3):371-82. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.3.371.
4
Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.半侧空间忽视中由位置概率调制的同时刺激之间的竞争
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1050-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.026. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
5
Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.空间忽视患者注意力控制设置的时间动态变化。
Brain Res. 2006 May 30;1092(1):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.069. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
6
Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.人类视觉中的注意力负荷与感觉竞争:外周视野任务无关刺激期间注视点负荷对功能磁共振成像反应的调制
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Jun;15(6):770-86. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh178. Epub 2004 Sep 30.
7
Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.人类顶叶皮质对未被注意刺激的注意力反应。
Brain. 2005 Dec;128(Pt 12):2843-57. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh522. Epub 2005 Apr 27.
8
Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.在不同感知负荷下处理多维物体:自下而上感知显著性的优先级
Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):113-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.071. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
9
Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.知觉负载影响空间和非空间视觉选择过程:一项事件相关脑电位研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2071-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
10
The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.颞下回介导了空间忽视患者对干扰物具有抗性的视觉搜索。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 May;17(5):788-99. doi: 10.1162/0898929053747676.

引用本文的文献

1
Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing.忽视诵读困难:周边和中央凹视野下的整词和词内错误。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Dec;241(11-12):2655-2668. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06708-4. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?二十年的负荷理论——我们现在何处,下一步该走向何方?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1316-1340. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0982-5.
3
Feasibility of a Semi-computerized Line Bisection Test for Unilateral Visual Neglect Assessment.
用于单侧视觉忽视评估的半计算机化直线二等分试验的可行性
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Jun 17;6(2):400-17. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-01-RA-0002. eCollection 2015.
4
Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.低水平感知而非注意过程调节高感知负荷显示中的分心物干扰:来自忽视/消失的证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 10;4:966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00966.
5
Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load.知觉负载理论中的概念和方法学问题。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 13;4:522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00522. eCollection 2013.
6
Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.知觉负载与稀释:注意焦点、刺激类别和目标可预测性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 7;4:327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00327. eCollection 2013.
7
Degraded stimulus visibility and the effects of perceptual load on distractor interference.刺激可见度降低与知觉负荷对分心物干扰的影响。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 29;4:289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00289. eCollection 2013.
8
Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.超越感知负载和稀释:工作记忆在选择性注意中的作用综述。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 21;4:287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00287. eCollection 2013.
9
Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.竞争解释了有限的注意力和感知资源:对感知负载和稀释理论的启示。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 10;4:243. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00243. eCollection 2013.
10
Neglect and extinction depend greatly on task demands: a review.忽视与消退在很大程度上取决于任务要求:一篇综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 17;6:195. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00195. eCollection 2012.