• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低水平感知而非注意过程调节高感知负荷显示中的分心物干扰:来自忽视/消失的证据。

Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.

机构信息

Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham Birmingham, UK.

Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel ; Department of Psychology, The College of Management Academic Studies Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 10;4:966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00966.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00966
PMID:24454297
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3887320/
Abstract

According to perceptual load theory (Lavie, 2005) distractor interference is determined by the availability of attentional resources. If target processing does not exhaust resources (with low perceptual load) distractor processing will take place resulting in interference with a primary task; however, when target processing uses-up attentional capacity (with high perceptual load) interference can be avoided. An alternative account (Tsal and Benoni, 2010a) suggests that perceptual load effects can be based on distractor dilution by the mere presence of additional neutral items in high-load displays so that the effect is not driven by the amount of attention resources required for target processing. Here we tested whether patients with unilateral neglect or extinction would show dilution effects from neutral items in their contralesional (neglected/extinguished) field, even though these items do not impose increased perceptual load on the target and at the same time attract reduced attentional resources compared to stimuli in the ipsilesional field. Thus, such items do not affect the amount of attention resources available for distractor processing. We found that contralesional neutral elements can eliminate distractor interference as strongly as centrally presented ones in neglect/extinction patients, despite contralesional items being less well attended. The data are consistent with an account in terms of perceptual dilution of distracters rather than available resources for distractor processing. We conclude that distractor dilution can underlie the elimination of distractor interference in visual displays.

摘要

根据知觉负载理论(Lavie,2005),分心物干扰取决于注意力资源的可利用性。如果目标处理没有耗尽资源(低知觉负载),那么分心物处理将会发生,从而对主要任务造成干扰;然而,当目标处理使用完注意力容量(高知觉负载)时,干扰可以避免。另一种解释(Tsal 和 Benoni,2010a)认为,知觉负载效应可以基于分心物的稀释,即在高负载显示中仅存在额外的中性项目,从而使效应不是由目标处理所需的注意力资源量驱动的。在这里,我们测试了单侧忽略或消光症患者是否会从他们对侧(忽略/消光)场中的中性项目中表现出稀释效应,即使这些项目不会增加目标的知觉负载,同时与同侧场中的刺激相比,吸引的注意力资源减少。因此,这些项目不会影响用于分心物处理的注意力资源量。我们发现,即使对侧项目的注意力较差,对侧中性元素也可以像中央呈现的中性元素一样有效地消除忽略/消光症患者的分心物干扰。数据与分心物的知觉稀释而不是分心物处理的可用资源的解释一致。我们得出结论,分心物稀释可以作为视觉显示中消除分心物干扰的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1696/3887320/e97a67696413/fpsyg-04-00966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1696/3887320/fbcef94a8840/fpsyg-04-00966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1696/3887320/e97a67696413/fpsyg-04-00966-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1696/3887320/fbcef94a8840/fpsyg-04-00966-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1696/3887320/e97a67696413/fpsyg-04-00966-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction.低水平感知而非注意过程调节高感知负荷显示中的分心物干扰:来自忽视/消失的证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 10;4:966. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00966.
2
Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).稀释:理论负担还是仅仅是负担?对 Tsal 和 Benoni(2010)的回复。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. doi: 10.1037/a0020733.
3
Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.注意定势会影响知觉负载效应,但不会影响稀释效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):785-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.830629. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
4
Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.我们哪里出错了?知觉负载并不影响选择性注意。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 18;50(13):1292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.018. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
5
Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.在操纵负载的同时控制稀释:感知和感官限制只是任务难度的两个方面。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):631-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0244-8.
6
Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.知觉负载与稀释:注意焦点、刺激类别和目标可预测性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 7;4:327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00327. eCollection 2013.
7
Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.打开窗口:注意窗口的大小在视觉选择中主导感知负荷和熟悉度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Nov;44(11):1780-1798. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000565. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects.分散负荷:知觉负荷效应只是稀释效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1645-56. doi: 10.1037/a0018172.
9
Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?选择性目标加工:知觉负荷还是干扰项显著性?
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):876-85. doi: 10.3758/bf03193540.
10
Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.处理重叠依赖的干扰物稀释而非感知目标负荷决定了注意力的选择性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Nov;80(8):2048-2059. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1545-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?能否利用知觉负载操作来验证自动性?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2037-2046. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1444-7.
2
Concentration: The Neural Underpinnings of How Cognitive Load Shields Against Distraction.注意力集中:认知负荷抵御干扰的神经学基础
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 18;10:221. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00221. eCollection 2016.
3
Early and late selection: effects of load, dilution and salience.早期选择与晚期选择:负荷、稀释及显著性的影响

本文引用的文献

1
Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.注意定势会影响知觉负载效应,但不会影响稀释效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(4):785-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.830629. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
2
Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.知觉负载与稀释:注意焦点、刺激类别和目标可预测性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 7;4:327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00327. eCollection 2013.
3
Controlling for dilution while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty.
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 20;5:248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00248. eCollection 2014.
在操纵负载的同时控制稀释:感知和感官限制只是任务难度的两个方面。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):631-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0244-8.
4
Object-based attention overrides perceptual load to modulate visual distraction.基于对象的注意力可以覆盖感知负载,从而调节视觉干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Jun;38(3):576-9. doi: 10.1037/a0027406. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
5
The central role of the temporo-parietal junction and the superior longitudinal fasciculus in supporting multi-item competition: evidence from lesion-symptom mapping of extinction.颞顶联合区和上纵束在支持多项竞争中的核心作用:来自消退的病变-症状映射的证据。
Cortex. 2013 Feb;49(2):487-506. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
6
Separating forms of neglect using the Apples Test: validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke.使用 Apples 测试分离忽视症的形式:在慢性和急性中风中的验证和功能预测。
Neuropsychology. 2011 Sep;25(5):567-80. doi: 10.1037/a0023501.
7
Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.稀释而非负荷影响分心物处理。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):319-35. doi: 10.1037/a0021433.
8
Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.非同时呈现的听觉音调可减少干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):714-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0064-8.
9
Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).稀释:理论负担还是仅仅是负担?对 Tsal 和 Benoni(2010)的回复。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. doi: 10.1037/a0020733.
10
Biased attentional shifts associated with unilateral left neglect.与单侧左忽视相关的偏向性注意力转移。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Jun 1;17(4):339-64. doi: 10.1080/026432900380436.