Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术与胆总管

Laparoscopic surgery and the common bile duct.

作者信息

Fitzgibbons R J, Gardner G C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2001 Oct;25(10):1317-24. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0117-1.

Abstract

Many biliary tract surgeons have now reached a level of sophistication with laparoscopic cholecystectomy that they are now able to deal with the common bile duct at the same time. Preoperative endoscopic cholangiography can be reserved for cases where choledocholithiasis has a high degree of probability. This has served to decrease the number of negative studies. The surgeon has five choices regarding stones confirmed by operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: (1) do nothing, hoping the stones will pass spontaneously or that a postoperative sphincterotomy with stone extraction will be successful; (2) perform a transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (best for stones less than 1 cm and distal to the cystic duct); (3) perform a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy (best for large stones in patients with common bile ducts greater than 1 cm. It is also the preferred approach with stones proximal to the insertion of the cystic duct.); (4) perform an intraoperative sphincterotomy with stone extraction, either retrograde or antegrade (this approach has some proponents but has not gained popularity among the majority of surgeons); and (5) place a double lumen catheter through the cystic duct with a proximal lumen in the common bile duct and the distal lumen in the duodenum. This can be used for serial postoperative cholangiography to confirm spontaneous stone passage or falsely positive operative cholangiograms. It is useful in situations when laparoscopic common bile duct exploration equipment or surgeon expertise is not available. If stones persist, a guidewire can be introduced through the distal lumen of the catheter for a guidewire-assisted sphincterotomy. Other CBD interventions that have been reported include laparoscopic biliary bypass and resection of choledochal cysts. Malignant lesions should not be approached by a laparoscopic method except in unusual circumstances.

摘要

现在,许多胆道外科医生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术方面已经达到了相当成熟的水平,他们现在能够同时处理胆总管。术前内镜胆管造影可保留用于胆总管结石可能性较高的病例。这有助于减少阴性检查的数量。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,对于经手术胆管造影证实的结石,外科医生有五种选择:(1)不采取任何措施,希望结石能自行排出,或者术后括约肌切开取石术能成功;(2)进行经胆囊管腹腔镜胆总管探查(最适合小于1 cm且位于胆囊管远端的结石);(3)通过胆总管切开术进行腹腔镜胆总管探查(最适合胆总管大于1 cm患者的大结石。对于位于胆囊管插入部近端的结石,这也是首选方法);(4)进行术中括约肌切开取石,无论是逆行还是顺行(这种方法有一些支持者,但在大多数外科医生中并不受欢迎);(5)通过胆囊管放置双腔导管,近端腔位于胆总管,远端腔位于十二指肠。这可用于术后系列胆管造影,以确认结石是否自行排出或手术胆管造影是否为假阳性。在没有腹腔镜胆总管探查设备或外科医生专业知识的情况下,它很有用。如果结石持续存在,可通过导管的远端腔引入导丝,进行导丝辅助括约肌切开术。其他已报道的胆总管干预措施包括腹腔镜胆肠吻合术和胆总管囊肿切除术。除特殊情况外,不应采用腹腔镜方法处理恶性病变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验