Specchia G, Lo Coco F, Vignetti M, Avvisati G, Fazi P, Albano F, Di Raimondo F, Martino B, Ferrara F, Selleri C, Liso V, Mandelli F
Department of Hematology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Oct 15;19(20):4023-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.20.4023.
Recent reports of extramedullary disease (EMD) at recurrence in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have raised increasing concern about a possible role of retinoic acid (RA) therapy.
We analyzed the risk of developing EMD localization at relapse in APL patients enrolled onto two consecutive studies of the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto. The studies investigated chemotherapy alone (LAP0389) versus RA plus chemotherapy (AIDA).
When all relapse types were taken into account, 94 (51%) of 184 patients and 131 (18%) of 740 patients who attained hematologic remission underwent relapse in the LAP0389 and AIDA studies, respectively (P < .0001). EMD localization was documented in five (5%) of 94 and 16 (12%) of 131 patients (P = .08). Hematologic and/or molecular relapse was diagnosed concomitantly in all but two patients with EMD in the AIDA study. For patients in the LAP0389 and AIDA series, the probability of EMD localization of any type at relapse was 3% and 4.5%, respectively (P = .79), while the probability of CNS involvement was 0.6% and 2% (P = .28). No significant differences were found with regard to mean WBC count and promyelocytic leukemia/retinoic acid receptor-alpha junction type in comparisons of patients with EMD and hematologic relapse.
APL patients receiving all-trans retinoic acid in addition to chemotherapy have no increased risk of developing EMD at relapse as compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone.
近期有关急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)复发时髓外疾病(EMD)的报道引发了人们对维甲酸(RA)治疗可能作用的日益关注。
我们分析了参加意大利成人血液学疾病研究组两项连续研究的APL患者复发时发生EMD定位的风险。这些研究分别调查了单纯化疗(LAP0389)与RA加化疗(AIDA)的疗效。
当考虑所有复发类型时,在LAP0389和AIDA研究中,分别有94例(184例中的51%)和131例(740例中的18%)达到血液学缓解的患者复发(P <.0001)。在94例患者中有5例(5%)和131例患者中有16例(12%)记录到EMD定位(P = 0.08)。在AIDA研究中,除两名EMD患者外,所有患者均同时诊断出血液学和/或分子复发。对于LAP0389和AIDA系列的患者,复发时任何类型EMD定位的概率分别为3%和4.5%(P = 0.79),而中枢神经系统受累的概率为0.6%和2%(P = 0.28)。在比较EMD患者和血液学复发患者时,白细胞计数均值和早幼粒细胞白血病/维甲酸受体-α连接类型方面未发现显著差异。
与单纯接受化疗的患者相比,接受全反式维甲酸联合化疗的APL患者复发时发生EMD的风险并未增加。