Huang J, Yin X, Lu M, Chen J, Liang L
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 1999 Jul;112(7):627-31.
To investigate portal hemodynamics and its correlation with esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) in cirrhotics with portal hypertension by using a newly-developed technique, color Doppler velocity profile (CDVP).
Hemodynamics of portal trunk (PT), right anterior branch (RAB) and splenic vein (SV) were evaluated in 48 cirrhotics with portal hypertension and 35 normal volunteers by CDVP. The parameters included maximum cross-sectional velocity (CS-Vmax), flow volume, congestion index (CI), profile parameter N and pattern of flow curve. Stepwise logistic regression model was employed to determine EVB-relating factors in cirrhotics.
CS-Vmax in PT and RAB was significantly lower in cirrhotic group than that of normal group, being 14.91 +/- 3.08 cm/s, 9.44 +/- 2.70 cm/s vs 30.52 +/- 6.75 cm/s, 12.82 +/- 2.69 cm/s, respectively (P < 0.01 for both). Flow volume of PT and SV was significantly higher in cirrhotic group compared with that of normal group, being 25.16 +/- 10.48 ml.min-1.kg-1, 15.83 +/- 9.18 ml.min-1.kg-1 vs 20.43 +/- 5.57 ml.min-1.kg-1, 5.81 +/- 2.04 ml.min-1.kg-1, respectively (P < 0.01 for both). CI of PT, RAB and SV was significantly higher in cirrhotic group than in normal group, being 0.142 +/- 0.0654, 0.105 +/- 0.0496, 0.0884 +/- 0.0431 vs 0.0326 +/- 0.0142, 0.0757 +/- 0.0342, 0.0483 +/- 0.0230, respectively (P < 0.01 for all). In dynamic variation of flow volume over time, RAB and SV in cirrhotic group increasingly presented flat pattern and periodically changed pattern, respectively (P < 0.01 for both). Between cirrhotic subgroups without and with EVB history, there were significant differences in flow volume, CI and N value of SV, splenic size, degree of esophageal varices (EV) and portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG), and stepwise logistic regression revealed that N value of SV, splenic size, degree of EV and PHG were four independent factors in relation to EVB. EVB scores calculated from the regression equation had a close correlation with EVB. In patients with EVB score > 0, 88.9% of them had EVB, and in those with EVB < 0, 76.9% of them had no history of EVB.
In cirrhotics with portal hypertension, portal venous system has the features of elevated vascular resistance and hyperdynamics, and the latter mainly results from increased blood flow in SV. EVB score may become a valuable parameter in predicting occurrence of EVB.
采用新开发的彩色多普勒速度剖面图(CDVP)技术,研究门静脉高压肝硬化患者的门静脉血流动力学及其与食管静脉曲张破裂出血(EVB)的相关性。
应用CDVP对48例门静脉高压肝硬化患者和35名正常志愿者的门静脉主干(PT)、右前支(RAB)和脾静脉(SV)的血流动力学进行评估。参数包括最大横截面速度(CS-Vmax)、血流量、充血指数(CI)、剖面参数N和血流曲线形态。采用逐步逻辑回归模型确定肝硬化患者EVB相关因素。
肝硬化组PT和RAB的CS-Vmax显著低于正常组,分别为14.91±3.08 cm/s、9.44±2.70 cm/s,而正常组分别为30.52±6.75 cm/s、12.82±2.69 cm/s(均P<0.01)。肝硬化组PT和SV的血流量显著高于正常组,分别为25.16±10.48 ml·min-1·kg-1、15.83±9.18 ml·min-1·kg-1,而正常组分别为20.43±5.57 ml·min-1·kg-1、5.81±2.04 ml·min-1·kg-1(均P<0.01)。肝硬化组PT、RAB和SV的CI显著高于正常组,分别为0.142±0.0654、0.105±0.0496、0.0884±0.0431,而正常组分别为0.0326±0.0142、0.0757±0.0342、0.0483±0.0230(均P<0.01)。在血流量随时间的动态变化中,肝硬化组RAB和SV分别越来越呈现出平坦型和周期性变化型(均P<0.01)。在无和有EVB病史的肝硬化亚组之间,SV的血流量、CI和N值、脾大小、食管静脉曲张(EV)程度和门静脉高压性胃病(PHG)存在显著差异,逐步逻辑回归显示SV的N值、脾大小、EV程度和PHG是与EVB相关的四个独立因素。由回归方程计算的EVB评分与EVB密切相关。EVB评分>0的患者中,88.9%发生过EVB,而EVB评分<0的患者中,76.9%无EVB病史。
门静脉高压肝硬化患者门静脉系统具有血管阻力升高和高动力循环的特点,后者主要是由于SV血流量增加所致。EVB评分可能成为预测EVB发生的有价值参数。