Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Letter: Urologist's view challenged.
Pediatrics. 1975 Aug;56(2):338.
2
Letter: Still more criticism.
Pediatrics. 1975 Aug;56(2):339.
3
Letter: A different view of the facts.
Pediatrics. 1975 Aug;56(2):339-40.
4
Why circumcision?
Pediatrics. 1974 Sep;54(3):362-4.
5
[The significance of circumcision in cancer prevention].
Landarzt. 1964 Dec 31;40(36):1562-6.
6
[Significance and incidence of phimosis and smegma].[包茎和包皮垢的意义及发病率]
Munch Med Wochenschr. 1967 Feb 18;108(7):373-7.
7
Prevalence of carcinoma of the penis with special reference to India.阴茎癌的患病率，特别提及印度。
Int Surg. 1975 Sep;60(9):474-6.
8
[On the problem of circumcision of newborn infants].
Zentralbl Gynakol. 1968 Mar 2;90(9):307-11.
9
Circumcision--a continuing enigma.
Aust Paediatr J. 1970 Mar;6(1):59-65.
10
Circumcision. A continuing enigma.
Aust Paediatr J. 1970 Jun;6(2):59-65.
Zotero 插件