• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过录音医患诊疗过程来验证儿科门诊病历的内容。

Validating the content of pediatric outpatient medical records by means of tape-recording doctor-patient encounters.

作者信息

Zuckerman Z E, Starfield B, Hochreiter C, Kovasznay B

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1975 Sep;56(3):407-11.

PMID:1161397
Abstract

Information in 51 tape-recorded physician-patient encounters was compared with information written in the patients' medical records. Diagnoses, chief complaints, scheduled appointments, non-drug therapy, and diagnostic studies were uniformly well-recorded. Medication names were well-recorded but dosages were not. Characteristics of care such as levels of function, probable cause of illness, reason for follow-up, and compliance were recorded poorly. Patients were more likely to known about and understand their diagnosis, and names, dosage, and intended function of their medications when this information was written in the record than when it was not. These findings indicate a relationship between the quality of medical records and the effectiveness of care.

摘要

对51次医患面谈的录音信息与患者病历中所写信息进行了比较。诊断结果、主要症状、预约安排、非药物治疗及诊断检查均记录良好。药物名称记录良好,但剂量记录不佳。功能水平、可能病因、随访原因及依从性等护理特征记录较差。当这些信息记录在病历中时,患者比未记录时更有可能了解并理解自己的诊断以及所用药物的名称、剂量和预期作用。这些发现表明病历质量与护理效果之间存在关联。

相似文献

1
Validating the content of pediatric outpatient medical records by means of tape-recording doctor-patient encounters.通过录音医患诊疗过程来验证儿科门诊病历的内容。
Pediatrics. 1975 Sep;56(3):407-11.
2
Fathers and the well-child visit.父亲与健康儿童检查
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e637-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1612.
3
[High quality medical records--high quality medicine].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Nov 20;112(28):3560-4.
4
The Pediatric Alliance for Coordinated Care: evaluation of a medical home model.儿科协调护理联盟:医疗之家模式评估
Pediatrics. 2004 May;113(5 Suppl):1507-16.
5
Patients' and relatives' complaints about encounters and communication in health care: evidence for quality improvement.患者及其亲属对医疗服务中诊疗过程与沟通的投诉:质量改进的证据
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 May;75(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
6
Measuring asthma quality in primary care: can we develop better measures?
Respir Med. 2006 Jan;100(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.04.010.
7
Follow-up services after an emergency department visit for substance abuse.急诊科就诊后针对药物滥用的后续服务。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Sep;13(9):497-505.
8
[Disagreement between physicians' medication records and information given by patients].[医生的用药记录与患者提供的信息之间的差异]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Mar 27;168(13):1307-10.
9
[Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration].[一组持续接受精神药物治疗的受试者治疗依从性中的自主性态度]
Encephale. 2002 Sep-Oct;28(5 Pt 1):389-96.
10
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.

引用本文的文献

1
How accurate is the medical record? A comparison of the physician's note with a concealed audio recording in unannounced standardized patient encounters.病历记录的准确性如何?在未事先通知的标准化患者就诊中,将医生的记录与隐藏式录音进行比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 May 1;27(5):770-775. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa027.
2
A systematic comparison of contemporary automatic speech recognition engines for conversational clinical speech.当代用于对话式临床语音的自动语音识别引擎的系统比较。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:683-689. eCollection 2018.
3
Impact of an American board of pediatrics maintenance of certification (MOC) on weight-related counseling at well-child check-ups.
美国儿科学会维持认证(MOC)对儿童健康检查时体重相关咨询的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.024. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
4
The Hawthorne effect in direct observation research with physicians and patients.医生与患者直接观察研究中的霍桑效应
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1322-1328. doi: 10.1111/jep.12781. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
5
Barbara Starfield: passage of the pathfinder of primary care.芭芭拉·斯塔菲尔德:初级保健先驱者的历程
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;9(4):292-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1293.
6
Statistical considerations in a systematic review of proxy measures of clinical behaviour.在系统评价代理措施临床行为的统计考虑因素。
Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 26;5:20. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-20.
7
An intelligent listening framework for capturing encounter notes from a doctor-patient dialog.用于从医患对话中捕获就诊记录的智能听力框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Nov 3;9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-S1-S3.
8
Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review.临床行为的有效替代衡量指标是否存在?系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2009 Jul 3;4:37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-37.
9
Explicit and implicit evaluation of physician adherence to hypertension guidelines.对医生遵循高血压指南情况的明确和隐性评估。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Feb;9(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06112.x.
10
Development of explicit criteria to measure adherence to hypertension guidelines.制定明确的标准以衡量对高血压指南的依从性。
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Jun;20(6):426-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002005.