Cleland J
Center for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Popul Stud (Camb). 1996 Nov;50(3):433-50. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000149556.
This evolution over the last 50 years of data collection systems in less developed countries is assessed. The progress made by civil registration systems has been extremely disappointing. Except in Central and South America, their role in providing vital rate estimates is still very limited. In contrast, the promulgation of regular population censuses has been a success, particularly in Africa. The relative merits and demerits of different types of demographic surveys are described. To some extent multi-round designs have given way to single-round surveys, such as the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). DHS-style enquiries are particularly suitable for evaluation of interventions but are less appropriate if the main aim is to measure vital rates.
本文评估了欠发达国家过去50年数据收集系统的演变。民事登记系统取得的进展极其令人失望。除了中美洲和南美洲,它们在提供人口动态率估计方面的作用仍然非常有限。相比之下,定期人口普查的推行取得了成功,尤其是在非洲。文中描述了不同类型人口调查的相对优缺点。在某种程度上,多轮设计已被单轮调查所取代,如人口与健康调查(DHS)。DHS式调查特别适合评估干预措施,但如果主要目的是衡量人口动态率,则不太合适。