Gilfoyle T J
Loyola University of Chicago.
Am Arch. 1994 Summer;57(3):514-27. doi: 10.17723/aarc.57.3.p74tr646p6r530lv.
In the past decade, the study of sexuality has proven to be one of the most dynamic academic enterprises. Among the most popular topics has been the history of prostitution. Archivists have been invaluable but largely unsung allies in the explosive growth of a new revisionist literature. Through the preservation of long-ignored and often-discarded records and manuscripts, archivists provided the means enabling historians to answer many new questions, not only about prostitution but about the history of sexuality. Yet some of these sources raise provocative and controversial problems for historians and archivists documenting the history of sexuality. The author acknowledges and thanks Loyola University of Chicago, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Newberry Library in Chicago for providing financial support to complete this article. His appreciation also extends to Mary Rose Alexander, Kenneth Cobb, Phillip Costello, and the anonymous referees of The American Archivist for their criticism and helpful comments on earlier drafts.
在过去十年中,性学研究已被证明是最具活力的学术领域之一。最热门的话题之一是卖淫史。在新修正主义文献的迅猛发展中,档案工作者一直是非常宝贵但大多未被赞颂的盟友。通过保存长期被忽视且常被丢弃的记录和手稿,档案工作者提供了手段,使历史学家能够回答许多新问题,不仅是关于卖淫,还有关于性史。然而,这些资料中的一些给记录性史的历史学家和档案工作者带来了具有挑衅性和争议性的问题。作者感谢芝加哥洛约拉大学、国家人文基金会以及芝加哥的纽伯里图书馆提供资金支持以完成本文。他还感谢玛丽·罗斯·亚历山大、肯尼斯·科布、菲利普·科斯特洛以及《美国档案工作者》的匿名审稿人对早期草稿的批评和有益评论。