Forsythe B, Melling J, Adair R
Department of Social Work and Probation Studies, University of Exeter, UK.
Soc Hist Med. 1996 Dec;9(3):335-55. doi: 10.1093/shm/9.3.335.
In this article we examine the impact of the policies and practices of the Guardians of the New Poor Law Unions on the management of pauper lunatics in four Devon Poor Law Unions in the critical period 1834-84. The central role of the Victorian Poor Law in provision made for the insane has only recently been recognized in the research literature. Scholars have been much more concerned with the activities of professionalizing physicians and the general project of state management than they have with the micro-politics of the local Poor Law and the magistracy who were responsible for the legal disposition of the insane. In this paper we argue that not only were the Guardians of the Poor Law Unions central in the determination of the lunatic's journey through the institutional systems provided in the mid-nineteenth century, but also that there were significant variations within the Poor Law system which made for contrasting systems of disposal of lunatics as between the Unions themselves. These variations in disposal of lunatics in Devon raise important questions of ideology, policy, and practice which, if repeated elsewhere, point to a need to refine significantly our assumptions regarding the disposal of pauper lunatics in England and Wales in the fifty years following the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act.
在本文中,我们考察了新济贫法联盟监护人的政策与做法,对1834至1884年这一关键时期德文郡四个济贫法联盟中贫民疯人的管理所产生的影响。维多利亚时代济贫法在为精神病人提供救助方面所起的核心作用,直到最近才在研究文献中得到认可。学者们更多关注的是医生职业化活动以及国家管理的总体项目,而非地方济贫法的微观政治以及负责精神病人法律处置的治安法官。在本文中,我们认为,济贫法联盟的监护人不仅在决定疯人在19世纪中叶所设立的机构系统中的历程方面至关重要,而且济贫法系统内部存在显著差异,这导致各联盟之间在疯人处置系统上形成对比。德文郡在疯人处置方面的这些差异,引发了有关意识形态、政策和实践的重要问题,如果在其他地方也存在类似情况,那就表明有必要大幅修正我们对1834年《济贫法修正案》颁布后五十年里英格兰和威尔士贫民疯人处置情况的假设。