Suppr超能文献

[无可用内容]

[Not Available].

作者信息

Dinges M

机构信息

Institut für Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung, Stuttgart.

出版信息

Med Ges Gesch. 1996;14:143-72.

Abstract

The processes leading to doctors becomming professional were not until recently compared on an international scale. There is, however, still no such comparison for doctors practicing alternative medicine. The national homoeopathic doctors' association of Germany and that of the United states of America are taken here as examples to examine the similarities and differences on the road to recognition and influence. The respective institutional frameworks of these two medical markets have a considerable effect on the possibilities of homeopathy and for those practicing homeopathy to organize themselves as a recognized profession.

摘要

直到最近,才开始在国际范围内比较医生成为专业人士的过程。然而,对于从事替代医学的医生,目前仍没有这样的比较。这里以德国和美国的国家顺势疗法医生协会为例,来探讨在获得认可和影响力的道路上的异同。这两个医疗市场各自的制度框架对顺势疗法的可能性以及顺势疗法从业者将自己组织成一个公认职业的可能性有相当大的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验